Papers › The Label Imitation Game: Turing Test Network for Zero-Shot Pseudo-Label Pruning

The Label Imitation Game: Turing Test Network for Zero-Shot Pseudo-Label Pruning

29 Jun 2026arXiv:2606.30875added by Syntology

Brent A. Griffin, Jason J. Corso

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Foundation model pseudo-labeling - labeling data strictly via zero-shot inference - enables massive scale, but performance is undermined by hallucinations that evade standard thresholds. To eliminate these errors, we introduce the Turing-inspired Label Imitation Game (LIG), a framework that formalizes pseudo-label pruning as an adversarial interrogation. Rather than filtering labels via isolated thresholds, we use the LIG to train a Turing Test Network (TTN), a task-agnostic "judge" that evaluates candidate pseudo-labels within a dataset-wide context. Experiments across four diverse datasets demonstrate the TTN's robustness, consistently enhancing label accuracy for three state-of-the-art vision-language models without costly supervision or retraining. Crucially, we demonstrate that learned semantic-contextual logic is a robust alternative to spatial-geometric verification, enabling a unique zero-shot task transfer capability - a TTN trained strictly on image classification datasets can effectively prune complex object detection pseudo-labels. This pruning yields F1-score gains of 28% for the worst-performing baseline categories and 44% with task-specific fine-tuning. Significantly, we also observe Category Revival, where the TTN pruning "detoxifies" the training signal for downstream models and enables them to recover from zero recall on transfer-vulnerable classes. The pre-trained TTN models and code are available at https://github.com/voxel51/ttn.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

5 samples harvested; 5 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 5 of the 5 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from voxel51/ttn. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2606.30875, was issued in June 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections