Papers › Mind the Residual Gap: Probabilistic Downscaling under Real-World Bias

Mind the Residual Gap: Probabilistic Downscaling under Real-World Bias

29 Jun 2026arXiv:2606.30821added by Syntology

Yujin Kim, Nidhi Soma, Sarah Dean

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Probabilistic downscaling is the task of modeling the conditional distribution of high-resolution fields given coarse inputs, and is a central challenge to atmospheric science, climate modeling, and other multiscale physical systems. A widely used paradigm decomposes the problem into a deterministic mean predictor followed by a stochastic residual generator. While effective in idealized settings, this mean--residual approach frequently produces biased and under-dispersive ensembles in real-world applications. Is this merely generic predictive uncertainty miscalibration? We show that the root cause is more fundamental: residual target misspecification, the residual distribution induced during training differs systematically from the one required at test time due to downscaling bias. To close this gap, we introduce ReMatch (Residual Distribution Matching). ReMatch aligns the training residual distribution toward the test-time regime via optimal transport in a low-dimensional PCA space. This preserves the statistical benefits of the mean--residual framework while reducing the train--test mismatch in the residual targets seen by the stochastic generator. On a controlled synthetic benchmark with varying bias levels and a real-world HRRR--ERA5 wind field downscaling task, ReMatch substantially reduces under-dispersion, improves calibration (SSR and CRPS), and outperforms strong baselines, including the standard mean--residual model and its variants, as well as state-of-the-art super-resolution models. Our code is available at https://github.com/sdean-group/ReMatch.git.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

26 samples harvested; 21 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 5 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 26 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 3 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2606.30821, was issued in June 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections