Papers › Learning from Mistakes: Rollout-Retrieval Lifelong Policy Learning for Autonomous Driving

Learning from Mistakes: Rollout-Retrieval Lifelong Policy Learning for Autonomous Driving

29 Jun 2026arXiv:2606.30537added by Syntology

Cheng Gong, Haoyang Wang, Chao Lu, Zirui Li, Jianwei Gong

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Autonomous driving policies should be able to improve continually as deployment exposes them to increasingly diverse and long-tail traffic situations. However, most learning-based policies are trained or fine-tuned on expert demonstrations and then rely largely on generalization to handle challenging closed-loop scenarios, lacking an explicit mechanism to correct and retain the mistakes exposed in these scenarios. This paper studies autonomous driving policy improvement from a lifelong learning perspective: Can a pretrained policy improve continually by accumulating corrective knowledge derived from its own mistakes, while retaining previously acquired driving competence? To answer this question, we propose Rollout-Retrieval Lifelong Policy Learning (R²LPL), a policy learning framework that retrieves corrective targets from recoverable policy-induced mistakes and retains the resulting knowledge through lifelong policy learning. R^2LPL addresses a key bottleneck in continual policy improvement: closed-loop mistakes reveal where the policy is weak, but do not directly specify what the policy should learn. By filtering recoverable mistake-related states and retrieving feasible corrective targets, R²LPL turns sparse failure evidence into compact supervised knowledge for stable and sample-efficient policy improvement. We evaluate R²LPL on large-scale closed-loop nuPlan benchmarks. With only a few rollout and continual-learning cycles, R²LPL elevates a learning-based planner with moderate initial performance to state-of-the-art performance across the evaluated benchmarks, especially on the challenging and long-tail Test14-hard split. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of R²LPL in converting recoverable closed-loop mistakes into corrective knowledge for sustained policy improvement.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

3 samples harvested; 2 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 3 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from Engibacter/R2LPL. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2606.30537, was issued in June 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections