Papers › Event-Conditioned Diagnostics of Kinematic, Contact, and Object-Permanence Structure...
Event-Conditioned Diagnostics of Kinematic, Contact, and Object-Permanence Structure in Passive Object-State World Models
Yang Liu, Yuming Chen
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
World models can predict future physical states, but prediction accuracy alone does not explain how physical information is organized and used inside their latent dynamics. We introduce a controlled diagnostic protocol for studying event-conditioned latent physical structure in passive object-state world models. The protocol separates three questions: whether event-regime information is readable, whether event context changes the relative emphasis of kinematic-, contact-, and object-permanence-related readouts, and whether suppressing readout-aligned directions affects prediction. Using a balanced controlled-generator dataset with free-motion, collision, and occlusion events, we evaluate GRU, Transformer-lite, and RSSM-lite transition models under a fixed-horizon forecasting setup. Across three independent seeds, all three architectures learn useful predictive dynamics and support reliable event-regime readout. Event context systematically shifts the relative readout pattern: free motion is kinematic-dominant, collision increases contact-related structure, and occlusion increases object-permanence-related structure. Time-aligned analyses show corresponding phase-related shifts. Fixed-horizon projection Causal Field Effect (CFE), used here as a functional-sensitivity test, gives the clearest evidence for contact-aligned structure in collision-contact windows. Object-permanence-aligned structure is also sensitive during hard occlusion, but control specificity remains mixed. These results support event-conditioned latent structure and functional sensitivity without implying explicit physical modules or isolated causal circuits.
In Syntology For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2606.28455")
Code
Syntology Ran 3 of 3 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 3 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 3 samples from 1 repository, 3 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
3 samples harvested; 3 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 3 of the 3 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from lysea8282/event-conditioned-world-model-diagnostics. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
bd18560364b8a0c2 · report
fd918ddb396ce3fa · report
eed96e37da48d1d3 · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2606.28455, was issued in June 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections