Papers › Accelerating Hierarchical Sparse Predictive Coding with Hybrid Amortized Inference

Accelerating Hierarchical Sparse Predictive Coding with Hybrid Amortized Inference

26 Jun 2026arXiv:2606.27802added by Syntology

Kazuhisa Fujita

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Hierarchical predictive coding provides an interpretable framework for perception as error-driven inference in multi-layer models, while sparse coding imposes parsimonious latent representations through explicit sparsity constraints. Their combination yields hierarchical sparse predictive coding models with appealing computational and neuroscientific properties, but practical use is often limited by the cost of iterative latent inference. In such models, each input may require many recurrent refinement steps before a useful sparse representation is obtained, and this burden becomes more severe as the hierarchy deepens. We study this bottleneck by comparing training-and-inference procedures that share the same hierarchical sparse objective formulation and architecture but use different latent-inference mechanisms. The comparison includes classical iterative inference based on ISTA, an accelerated MFISTA reference, structurally informed amortized inference using a LISTA-style bottom-up encoder adapted to the hierarchical model, and a Hybrid procedure in which this fast amortized initialization is followed by a small number of corrective energy-based refinement steps. Each procedure is trained separately, allowing its inference mechanism to interact with dictionary learning and, where applicable, encoder learning. We measure the resulting reconstruction quality, sparsity, latency, and run-to-run variability across random seeds on static image benchmarks. The results show that Hybrid improves over pure amortization in the tested settings while remaining substantially faster than procedures based on long iterative inference.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

13 samples harvested; 11 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 13 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from KazuhisaFujita/HSC. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2606.27802, was issued in June 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections