Papers › Large Language Model Teaches Visual Students: Cross-Modality Transfer of Fine-Grained...

Large Language Model Teaches Visual Students: Cross-Modality Transfer of Fine-Grained Conceptual Knowledge

25 Jun 2026ICMLarXiv:2606.27527added by Syntology

Thomas Shih-Chao Liang, Zhuoran Yu, Yong Jae Lee

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Large Language Models (LLMs) possess broad conceptual knowledge acquired through large-scale text pretraining, yet their potential to supervise models in other modalities remains underexplored. In this work, we propose LaViD--Language-to-Visual Knowledge Distillation--a simple and effective framework for transferring high-level semantic knowledge from a language-only teacher to a vision-only student model. Instead of relying on paired multimodal data, LaViD elicits conceptual signals from an LLM by prompting it to generate multiple-choice questions (MCQs) that probe semantic distinctions between visual classes. Each class is mapped to a soft label distribution over these MCQs, forming a rich conceptual signature that guides the student through an auxiliary distillation loss. Notably, despite using a language-only teacher without access to image data, LaViD consistently outperforms recent methods like MaKD that distill from vision-language models across multiple fine-grained benchmarks. It also achieves competitive or superior performance compared to state-of-the-art visual distillation methods such as DKD and MLKD, with further gains when combined with logit standardization. On the Waterbirds dataset, LaViD substantially improves worst-group accuracy, demonstrating enhanced robustness to spurious correlations with distillation. Code is available at https://github.com/lliangthomas/lavid.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

14 samples harvested; 2 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 12 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 14 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from lliangthomas/lavid. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2606.27527, was issued in June 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Placed on leaderboards by Syntology Syntology

Syntology's extractor considered 2 leaderboards for this paper and placed the paper on none of them: 2 refused by a rule. What is not shown.

Syntology has checked 6,264 of the 9,581 papers on this site that are newer than the archive; results from the others appear after they are checked.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections