Papers › From Vajrayana Tara to Bengali Baul: A Computational Study of Lexical Transmission...

From Vajrayana Tara to Bengali Baul: A Computational Study of Lexical Transmission Across Buddhist, Shakta, and Vaishnava Traditions in Bengal

25 Jun 2026arXiv:2606.26803added by Syntology

Joy Bose

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

We present a computational corpus study of vocabulary relationships across eight tradition layers of Bengali and Sanskrit devotional literature spanning the 8th to 19th centuries, encompassing Buddhist Vajrayana, Shakta Tantra, Vaishnava, and Baul traditions. Using a corpus of 75 texts and TF-IDF character n-gram vectorization with cosine similarity analysis, we address the historically argued but previously unquantified claim that Buddhist Vajrayana vocabulary survived the collapse of the Pala monasteries and was absorbed into the Shakta Tantra tradition of Bengal. The central finding is a specificity result: the Gitagovinda (Vaishnava Sanskrit, 12th century) has zero cosine similarity to Shakta Kali texts, while Bridge Tara texts (Buddhist-Shakta transitional, same century, same language) have cosine similarity 0.54 to Shakta Kali. This 8.5-fold contrast between two Sanskrit traditions from the same century demonstrates that the Buddhist-Shakta vocabulary overlap is not a generic property of Sanskrit devotional literature but is specific to the Buddhist-Shakta transmission chain. Three Brihannilatantra Tara texts show Shakta-to-Buddhist vocabulary ratios of 2.0 to 4.0, constituting measurable evidence of lexical transition within that chain. Ramprasad Sen's 18th-century Bengali Kali songs preserve Buddhist vocabulary residue including 56 occurrences of Tara alongside 103 occurrences of Kali. The Vaishnava Bengali tradition contributes a parallel chain to modern Baul vocabulary (similarity 0.29), slightly weaker than the Buddhist Sahajiya chain via Charyapada (0.31). These results provide the first quantitative multi-tradition corroboration of historically argued Buddhist-Shakta syncretism in Bengal.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

5 samples harvested; 5 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 5 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from joyboseroy/bengal-dharma-corpus. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2606.26803, was issued in June 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections