Papers › EVOM: Agentic Meta-Evolution of Actor-Critic Architectures for Reinforcement Learning
EVOM: Agentic Meta-Evolution of Actor-Critic Architectures for Reinforcement Learning
Boyun Zhang, Chao Wang, Kai Wu
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
In actor-critic reinforcement learning, network architectures are typically manually designed. Automating this design is challenging because each candidate must be trained before evaluation, and the design space is open-ended. To address these challenges, we introduce EVOM, an agentic meta-evolution framework for discovering high-performance actor-critic architectures. We frame architecture search as a bi-level optimization: an inner loop trains weights via the low-fidelity proximal policy optimization (PPO), while an outer loop drives meta-evolution by iteratively refining architecture programs. Crucially, this outer loop is powered by an LLM-based design agent that operates purely as an architecture designer, completely decoupled from policy execution and environment control. Experiments reveal that EVOM outperforms the manually designed baseline, an LLM-guided random search, and the state-of-the-art LLM-guided programmatic policy search method MLES, delivering superior performance on Ant-v4 and HalfCheetah-v4. Ablation studies validate that both the meta-evolution loop and the LLM Design Agent are indispensable for final performance.
In Syntology For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2606.26327")
Code
Syntology Ran 7 of 19 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 12 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 5 ran · our draft was wrong; 2 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 19 samples from 1 repository, 7 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
19 samples harvested; 7 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 12 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 19 of the 19 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from xiaofangxd/EVOM. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
6c9eab99b324f828 · report
c6b8cbd81820efae · report
93353b8461c3a32c · report
b53e4616decfefdf · report
3291ac84cf0eff82 · report
6e56c2f976486e74 · report
f35e935efb5324df · report
23868fa5ca35de6d · report
efd1bc03136b7e34 · report
22f9fd2a74cc4a1a · report
4059eedeb5b85610 · report
d5fbbaa6466c3ddd · report
82e34fa3d741ddb4 · report
a781290489876ffe · report
3e2f8d3b44de4135 · report
099b569afd7eb4a1 · report
d7696a75395929c1 · report
d2899b598570c525 · report
d96fcc24d1013b0b · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2606.26327, was issued in June 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections