Papers › EPTS: Elastic Post-Training Sparsity for Efficient Large Language Model Compression

EPTS: Elastic Post-Training Sparsity for Efficient Large Language Model Compression

24 Jun 2026arXiv:2606.25285added by Syntology

Ke Xu, Jiaqi Wan, Wenhao Hu, Han Pu, Xiaoyun Wang

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Post-Training Sparsity (PTS) has emerged as a crucial paradigm for compressing Large Language Models to facilitate efficient deployment on resource-constrained devices. However, existing PTS methodologies are typically confined to Single-Sparsity optimization, necessitating a separate, time-consuming optimization session for each specific sparsity level. This rigid paradigm significantly hinders flexible deployment across diverse hardware scenarios, as adapting to a new sparsity requirement mandates a complete re-optimization process. To address these limitations, we propose Elastic Post-Training Sparsity (EPTS), a unified Multi-Sparsity framework that produces a single elastic model capable of maintaining robust performance across diverse sparsity configurations through a one-shot optimization process. Specifically, we design a Multi-Sparsity Hierarchy LoRA (MS-HiLoRA) mechanism that facilitates knowledge inheritance from low- to high-sparsity groups, effectively mitigating the competition for parameter reconstruction. Furthermore, we introduce a Multi-Sparsity Feature Mixer (MSFM), which significantly enhances the model's adaptability to pruning perturbations by dynamically fusing feature representations of varying sparsity granularities. Extensive experiments on LLaMA and OPT families demonstrate that EPTS achieves competitive performance compared to state-of-the-art methods like SparseGPT and Wanda, while offering significant efficiency gains by enabling multi-scenario deployment from a single optimization. our source code is available at https://github.com/xuke225/EPTS.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

9 samples harvested; 9 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 9 of the 9 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from xuke225/EPTS. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2606.25285, was issued in June 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections