Papers › Enhancing Protein Representation Learning via Manifold Restore Mixing

Enhancing Protein Representation Learning via Manifold Restore Mixing

21 Jun 2026arXiv:2606.22307added by Syntology

Yizhou Dang, Chuang Zhao, Lianbo Ma, Guibing Guo, Xingwei Wang, Zhu Sun

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Data augmentation (DA) has been proven to be an effective means for improving protein representation learning (PRL) by generating additional training samples. Although mainstream perturbation- and sampling-based augmentation methods can produce data containing sufficient variations, they carry the risk of disrupting the protein structure and function. Some crafted protein homology modeling tools can generate conformations, but reduce structural diversity. The above dilemmas lead us to a question: Can we restore the disrupted structure caused by DA operations, providing data with both the original structure and diverse variations? In this work, we first analyze and empirically reveal the structure defect and performance degradation issues of existing DA methods. Based on the findings, we propose a simple yet effective DA method, Manifold Restore Mixing (MRM), for protein representation learning. Specifically, inspired by manifold mixup, we mix the hidden representations of original and augmented protein data to generate new samples that restore structural information lost in DA while introducing diverse variations. Furthermore, we develop a sample difficulty scheduler that adjusts the beta distribution in mixup to provide models with progressively challenging mixed samples during training, which improves the final performance. Comprehensive experiments on various PRL backbones and downstream tasks demonstrate the effectiveness and generalization of our method. The complete code and weights will be released upon acceptance. We provide a implementation at https://github.com/KingGugu/MRM.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

6 samples harvested; 4 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 6 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from KingGugu/MRM. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2606.22307, was issued in June 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections