Papers › The Pitfall of Scaling Up: Uncovering and Mitigating Popularity Bias Amplification in...
The Pitfall of Scaling Up: Uncovering and Mitigating Popularity Bias Amplification in Scaling Transformer-based Recommenders
Weiqin Yang, Yue Pan, Chongming Gao, Sheng Zhou, Xiang Wang, Can Wang, Jiawei Chen
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
We identify a critical pitfall in scaling transformer-based sequential recommenders: while increasing model size improves recommendation accuracy, it simultaneously amplifies popularity bias. This bias drives systems to over-recommend popular items at the expense of niche ones, which not only undermines fairness but also degrades the broader ecosystem by reinforcing the Matthew effect and filter bubbles. Consequently, this bias amplification emerges as a fundamental obstacle to sustainable model scaling. Through comprehensive theoretical and empirical analyses, we uncover the root cause of this amplification. Our findings reveal that as model depth increases, the two core components of the transformer architecture, i.e., attention aggregation and feed-forward projections, synergistically induce severe spectral collapse in model predictions, which directly translates to the amplification of popularity bias. To address this challenge, we propose SPRINT (Scalable Popularity Regularization IN Transformers), which mitigates spectral collapse during scaling by constraining (i) the maximum column-sums of the attention score matrices and (ii) the spectral norms of the feed-forward parameters. Extensive experiments demonstrate that SPRINT significantly improves both accuracy and long-tail fairness. Crucially, it yields more favorable scaling behaviors when expanding model sizes from 0.05M to 0.34B parameters. The code is available at https://github.com/Tiny-Snow/GenRec.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2606.21911")
Code
Syntology Ran 13 of 21 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 8 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 4 ran · our draft was wrong; 9 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 21 samples from 1 repository, 13 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
21 samples harvested; 13 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 8 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 21 of the 21 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from Tiny-Snow/GenRec. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
488e1bb83c85f341 · report
82a2d670a351cbcf · report
75ded7213e219c95 · report
07ff73afa3911f6e · report
b89ce6bdb491458b · report
d0d21bf676706d81 · report
49543225751db673 · report
2a9736ec75c8f2e6 · report
16cc26fda10c60d5 · report
b715a071c5e5950e · report
91bc58efb8a6482c · report
c0a89ebc4ff52cfa · report
47707f71d70f0e88 · report
0b073d32bfd3c05b · report
0b10c79d66d2d677 · report
199f465a3120a890 · report
a84943b3c054306f · report
69a17bdd3d96368a · report
d43db4567d066323 · report
02c8a46c743dfcca · report
843d865386c25bb5 · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2606.21911, was issued in June 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections