Papers › PACT: Preserving Anchored Cores in Task-vectors for Model Merging

PACT: Preserving Anchored Cores in Task-vectors for Model Merging

17 Jun 2026arXiv:2606.18627added by Syntology

Ningyuan Shi, Zhipeng Zhou, Hao Wang, Chunyan Miao, Peilin Zhao

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Model merging has emerged as a training-free alternative to multi-task learning, aiming to combine multiple task-specific fine-tuned models into a single multi-task model. Most existing model merging approaches follow the Task Arithmetic paradigm, which decomposes fine-tuned weights into pre-trained parameters and task vectors, and performs merging exclusively in the task-vector space. The effectiveness of this paradigm implicitly relies on the assumption that task-specific knowledge is encoded solely within task vectors. We argue that this assumption generally does not hold due to the intrinsic task preferences of pre-trained models. Specifically, we identify \textbf{Load-Bearing Wall (LBW) dimensions}, namely some task-critical knowledge that remains embedded in the pre-trained weights rather than being fully transferred into task vectors. We characterize LBW dimensions from both scalar-weight and subspace perspectives, thereby covering the major paradigms of existing model merging methods. Our analysis reveals that, by ignoring LBW dimensions, task-vector-based approaches fail to fully resolve task conflicts and may inadvertently damage task-specific knowledge encoded in the pre-trained model, leading to degradation. To address this issue, we propose PACT, which preserves the anchored task-specific cores (i.e., LBW dimensions) within task vectors by aligning their orthogonal complements with the subspace of the pre-trained weights. These aligned subspace components are then removed from the task vectors before applying existing model merging algorithms. Furthermore, we develop an efficient variant based on randomized SVD to improve scalability. PACT can be seamlessly integrated with existing methods. Extensive experiments across multiple benchmarks demonstrate that PACT consistently enhances mainstream model merging approaches and establishes new state-of-the-art performance.

PaperPDFCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2606.18627")

Code

Syntology Ran 7 of 8 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 1 has no recorded run. Of those that ran: 7 ran · our draft was wrong.

By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 8 samples from 1 repository, 7 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

dajvmasonjason-glitch/pact found in paper text by Syntology report

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

8 samples harvested; 7 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

7ran · our draft was wrong
1unverified

Licence: 8 of the 8 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from dajvmasonjason-glitch/pact. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

compute_implicit_reliance_space dajvmasonjason-glitch/pact/full-finetune/src/utils/pact_utils.py found in paper text by Syntology ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · f5a10554cb6c878d · report
extract_pretrained_core_space dajvmasonjason-glitch/pact/full-finetune/src/utils/pact_utils.py found in paper text by Syntology ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · b4fe04bf747c4c0a · report
extract_pretrained_core_space_fixed dajvmasonjason-glitch/pact/full-finetune/src/utils/pact_utils.py found in paper text by Syntology ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · 2c5476ffe4253d95 · report
extract_task_explicit_space dajvmasonjason-glitch/pact/full-finetune/src/utils/pact_utils.py found in paper text by Syntology ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · c45e72e6a0437cd1 · report
extract_task_explicit_space_fixed dajvmasonjason-glitch/pact/full-finetune/src/utils/pact_utils.py found in paper text by Syntology ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · 0b2d797470b869ac · report
orthogonal_core_filtering dajvmasonjason-glitch/pact/full-finetune/src/utils/pact_utils.py found in paper text by Syntology ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · 7e6f89c36673d97d · report
select_pact_layer_keys dajvmasonjason-glitch/pact/full-finetune/src/utils/pact_utils.py found in paper text by Syntology ran · our draft was wrong no licence file found · pointer only · 4bc49ed9a5df5ff1 · report
pact_ta_merge dajvmasonjason-glitch/pact/full-finetune/src/utils/pact_utils.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified no licence file found · pointer only · dac34dc95f0392af · report

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2606.18627, was issued in June 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections