Papers › Closure-Validated Circuit Discovery in Attention Heads: Co-activation Proposes,...
Closure-Validated Circuit Discovery in Attention Heads: Co-activation Proposes, Ablation Disposes
Yongzhong Xu
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Interpretability increasingly treats groups of components, not individual units, as the basic object, and proposes to find them by clustering co-activation statistics. We ask whether such a cheap signal actually identifies an attention-head circuit. Adapting a sparse-autoencoder clustering recipe to attention heads -- but validating by causal ablation rather than reconstruction -- we cluster heads and then run a closure test: ablate the discovered community and compare per-example damage to matched-random controls. Across two dense 1B-scale models (Pythia 1B, OLMo 1B) and two input distributions, the communities pass closure. In a Mixture-of-Experts model (OLMoE-1B-7B), route-conditional clustering recovers a statistically real signal that nonetheless does not survive closure -- ablation improves loss, the wrong direction. Extending closure across training, attention-target selectivity and participation ratio decouple from function in both directions. We conclude that a cheap signal is a circuit proposal, not a confirmed circuit; closure is what separates them.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2606.09607")
Code
Syntology Ran 18 of 20 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 2 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 18 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 20 samples from 1 repository, 18 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
20 samples harvested; 18 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 20 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from skydancerosel/coactivation-closure. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
0a27e5f8df47991a · report
0c78886f94b3f6eb · report
8d7c9bc62f2becdd · report
8c51cbf46667312d · report
1e52205f22b814fa · report
acf74f6ad99f9f97 · report
8fa9b2fb8d43738a · report
97a35722da7538dd · report
3b2c30ae4c8e6d25 · report
a4e1334eaf63a0e0 · report
8fd8b2b800c739f4 · report
465531a9283db4d0 · report
9b4fd51b124e8e38 · report
42a0a461d8483ebe · report
7d0df836b41c41f0 · report
5473f133c9597574 · report
caa2d8429b3ae290 · report
805a6e705b42ec63 · report
7cf4e93599c5a110 · report
7a80a252257f4ac4 · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2606.09607, was issued in June 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections