Papers › TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through...

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning

8 Jun 2026arXiv:2606.09251added by Syntology

Benjamin Stieger, Maximilian Terberger, Thomas Huber, Christina Niklaus

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

We present TruthSplit, an interactive system for multi-perspective argument analysis. Existing argumentation tools typically analyze properties of the argument itself, such as structure, quality, stance, or persuasiveness, while leaving perspective-specific background knowledge implicit. TruthSplit addresses this gap by supporting an exploratory analysis of how the same claim can lead to different conclusions when interpreted through worldview-specific values, assumptions, and conceptual definitions. We refer to this perspective-dependent analysis as conditional validity. Given an input argumentative text, TruthSplit extracts claims and premises, applies a three-layer natural language inference (NLI) approach to assess both logical and worldview-specific normative consistency, and conditions large language model (LLM) reasoning on structured worldview profiles that encode core values and decision principles. The system then generates perspective-specific interpretations, identifies value conflicts and assumption gaps, and visualizes divergence through interactive analytical interfaces.

PaperPDFCode Syntology ran

In Syntology For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2606.09251")

Code

Syntology Ran 1 of 6 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 5 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 6 samples from 1 repository, 1 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

unisg-ics-dsnlp/truthsplit found in paper text by Syntology report

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

6 samples harvested; 1 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 5 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran
5unverified

Licence: 0 of the 6 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from unisg-ics-dsnlp/truthsplit. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

get_gemma_analyzer unisg-ics-dsnlp/truthsplit/truthSplitStiegerTerberger/api_server.py found in paper text by Syntology ran MIT (permissive) · f18c905be611d4b7 · report
analyze_with_gemma unisg-ics-dsnlp/truthsplit/truthSplitStiegerTerberger/api_server.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified MIT (permissive) · 99de1674157886ee · report
get_steering_manager unisg-ics-dsnlp/truthsplit/truthSplitStiegerTerberger/gemma_steering/steering_manager.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified MIT (permissive) · 64b685b06fbc290d · report
link_claims_to_worldviews unisg-ics-dsnlp/truthsplit/truthSplitStiegerTerberger/comparative_reasoning/claim_linker.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified MIT (permissive) · 05c0450f3fb7fa63 · report
test_consistency unisg-ics-dsnlp/truthsplit/truthSplitStiegerTerberger/comparative_reasoning/consistency_tester.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified MIT (permissive) · dcbf00325c7864e3 · report
test_worldview_consistency unisg-ics-dsnlp/truthsplit/truthSplitStiegerTerberger/comparative_reasoning/consistency_tester.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified MIT (permissive) · c3141f58a05ef267 · report

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2606.09251, was issued in June 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections