Papers › Closed-Form Spectral Regularization for Multi-Task Model Merging
Closed-Form Spectral Regularization for Multi-Task Model Merging
Yongxian Wei, Runxi Cheng, Xingxuan Zhang, Li Shen, Chun Yuan, Peng Cui, Dacheng Tao
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Model merging combines several independently fine-tuned experts into a single multi-task model without any training data, reducing the storage, serving, and decentralized-development costs of large foundation models. State-of-the-art merging methods formulate merging as a layer-wise quadratic interference minimization problem. Although this problem admits an exact closed-form pseudoinverse solution, that solution underperforms hundreds of iterations of gradient descent in practice. The iterative loop dominates the cost of the pipeline, yet its effectiveness has remained unexplained. We revisit this regime and show that the iterative solver does not primarily act as an optimizer; rather, it serves as an implicit spectral regularizer for an ill-posed normal equation, where small-eigenvalue directions of the per-layer interference operator amplify proxy noise. Building on this finding, we formalize multi-task model merging as a noisy linear inverse problem and propose a spectral filtering estimator parameterized by a per-direction filter. We instantiate this estimator with SWUDI, a closed-form method that combines a soft exponential filter, which matches the gradient-flow trajectory of iterative descent, with a hard top-K truncation that suppresses noise-amplifying small-eigenvalue directions. Furthermore, we propose SWUDI-A, an adaptive variant that replaces the global rank hyperparameter with per-layer rank rules, further improving robustness across architectures. Both variants share a single symmetric eigendecomposition per linear layer and require no training data or optimizer state. Across four general benchmarks and a multimodal merging benchmark spanning VQA, Geometry, Chart, OCR, Grounding, and modality merging, our proposed spectral solvers match or outperform state-of-the-art merging methods. Crucially, they reduce wall-clock time by 28-72x and peak GPU memory by up to 50%.
In Syntology For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2606.07289")
Code
Syntology Ran 18 of 19 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 1 has no recorded run. Of those that ran: 3 ran · our draft was wrong; 2 ran · fixture could not drive it; 13 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 19 samples from 1 repository, 18 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
19 samples harvested; 18 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 19 of the 19 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from WalkerWorldPeace/MLLMerging. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
57e95166ade5f25c · report
d086657e28ce7f38 · report
62fed5db332affd0 · report
0d07817f34e79b4b · report
6dc77bb22fb9d660 · report
bd77f5f8067f18e9 · report
dcafd602728bc51e · report
b22f6cc19ab398f9 · report
4745bf56ff70c712 · report
c722e6776be8c9ac · report
20f6ae118d68fdc8 · report
5bd838966b120daf · report
78ad18c6bed292e3 · report
840fb864701f8f6d · report
1d7b10d84936c164 · report
4c8f7beb44c32119 · report
23fb066c145e3d74 · report
d65d19229b71e75f · report
3855144c1081b166 · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2606.07289, was issued in June 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections