Papers › Inverting the Streaming-Diffusion Bottleneck: Video-Rate MLLM-Conditioned Edit...

Inverting the Streaming-Diffusion Bottleneck: Video-Rate MLLM-Conditioned Edit Diffusion on a Consumer GPU

4 Jun 2026arXiv:2606.05981added by Syntology

Yoshiyuki Ootani

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Aggressive distillation of the diffusion U-Net inverts the per-frame bottleneck of real-time text-to-image pipelines: once the denoiser is a 4-step or 1-step distilled student, the text encoder becomes the critical path. This inversion is most acute in vision-aware edit diffusion, where the encoder is a multimodal large language model (MLLM). We study a 0.39B distilled edit U-Net paired with a 2.13B MLLM text encoder (Qwen3-VL) and present a streaming pipeline for this regime built on three mechanisms that keep the encoder off the denoiser's critical path rather than shrinking the encoder: asymmetric side-stream / main-stream CUDA pipelining with batched text-encoder amortisation, a compile-friendly ControlNet-LLLite reformulation that folds the whole U-Net + adapter stack into one fused graph, and a periodic conditioning-refresh schedule with a hook subset that amortises the per-frame conditioning cost. On a single consumer RTX 3090 Ti at 512x512 this sustains 27-30 fps over a 480-frame run; at the same operating point steady-state throughput scales to 55 fps on RTX 4090 and 74 fps on RTX 5090. This shows that once distillation is aggressive enough, further gains come from encoder-side systems work rather than further denoiser compression -- the opposite lever from the one the streaming-diffusion literature has optimised to date. We report video-rate streaming throughput, not interactive low latency, and locate our numbers against same-stack StreamDiffusion re-runs as systems context, not a superiority claim. The released oil-painting adapter generalises within in-clip noise to 19 unused DAVIS-2017 sequences and 15 non-DAVIS clips from seven sources; prompt-level generalisation to unseen styles is bounded and reported separately.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

26 samples harvested; 22 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 4 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 26 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from otanl/dreamlite-stream. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2606.05981, was issued in June 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections