Papers › MemoryCard: Topic-Aware Multi-Modal Clue Compression for Long-Video Question Answering

MemoryCard: Topic-Aware Multi-Modal Clue Compression for Long-Video Question Answering

4 Jun 2026arXiv:2606.05917added by Syntology

Qing Yang, Pengcheng Huang, Xinze Li, Zhenghao Liu, Yukun Yan, Yu Gu, Ge Yu, Gang Li, Maosong Sun

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Long-video question answering remains challenging for Vision-Language Models (VLMs), as answer-relevant evidence is often sparse, transient, and temporally dispersed across lengthy video contexts. Existing frame-centric approaches improve efficiency through uniform sampling, query-aware frame selection, visual-token compression, and adaptive resolution strategies. However, they still rely on isolated and fragmented frames as the fundamental evidence units, limiting VLMs' ability to effectively capture coherent event-level semantics. To address this limitation, we propose MemoryCard, a video-memory-based augmentation framework that organizes long videos into self-contained Memory Cards. Specifically, MemoryCard first performs a self-reading process over videos and aligned utterances to segment the video into semantically coherent units, each corresponding to a distinct topic or event. For each unit, it generates an event-level video gist and selects representative visual moments, which are then rendered into unified Memory Cards for retrieval and question answering. Experimental results demonstrate that MemoryCard consistently improves long-video QA performance under comparable visual-token budgets, achieving up to a 21.8% relative improvement in accuracy. All code is available at https://github.com/NEUIR/MemoryCard.

PaperPDFCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2606.05917")

Code

Syntology Ran 5 of 6 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 1 has no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran · our draft was wrong; 3 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 6 samples from 1 repository, 5 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

NEUIR/MemoryCard found in paper text by Syntology report

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

6 samples harvested; 5 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

2ran · our draft was wrong
3ran
1unverified

Licence: 0 of the 6 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from NEUIR/MemoryCard. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

get_sample_size NEUIR/MemoryCard/lmms_eval/evaluator_utils.py found in paper text by Syntology ran MIT (permissive) · 00f5e7d9ee6636ba · report
hash_args NEUIR/MemoryCard/lmms_eval/api/model.py found in paper text by Syntology ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · 20a7cc804eb22661 · report
make_context NEUIR/MemoryCard/lmms_eval/models/cambrian.py found in paper text by Syntology ran MIT (permissive) · be348573c1a9db9c · report
remove_none_pattern NEUIR/MemoryCard/lmms_eval/logging_utils.py found in paper text by Syntology ran fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · 74386ef186ff5c64 · report
request_caching_arg_to_dict NEUIR/MemoryCard/lmms_eval/evaluator.py found in paper text by Syntology ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · c44830a7722ff5f7 · report
process NEUIR/MemoryCard/lmms_eval/models/cambrian.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified MIT (permissive) · 870ab787b0ca467f · report

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2606.05917, was issued in June 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections