Papers › TrustLDM: Benchmarking Trustworthiness in Language Diffusion Models

TrustLDM: Benchmarking Trustworthiness in Language Diffusion Models

15 Apr 2026arXiv:2606.00023added by Syntology

Yichuan Mo, Yukun Jiang, Yanbo Shi, Mingjie Li, Michael Backes, Yang Zhang, Yisen Wang

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

The rapid development of Language Diffusion Models (LDMs) challenges the dominant position of auto-regressive competitors in language processing. However, their flexible, any-order decoding strategies not only enable fast decoding speed but also potentially bring new trustworthiness challenges. To better understand the risks behind their pipelines, we introduce a comprehensive trustworthiness benchmark tailored to LDMs (TrustLDM), evaluating safety, privacy, and fairness across different LDM architectures with multiple categories of static post contexts. Our empirical results show that although LDMs generally exhibit strong trustworthiness with only the user prompts, their alignment behavior degrades noticeably when the malicious post contexts are attached to the masked responses. We further observe that longer contexts do not necessarily induce stronger effects, and both decoding order and generation length affect the evaluation outcomes. Finally, we propose TrustLDM-Auto, an automatic evaluation framework that leverages LDM decoding flexibility to systematically identify vulnerable configurations, revealing substantial trustworthiness weaknesses across all evaluated models and dimensions. Our work may potentially help the community build more trustworthy LDMs. Our code is available at https://github.com/PKU-ML/TrustLDM.

PaperPDFCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2606.00023")

Code

Syntology Ran 3 of 4 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 1 has no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran · fixture could not drive it; 1 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 4 samples from 1 repository, 3 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

PKU-ML/TrustLDM found in paper text by Syntology report

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

4 samples harvested; 3 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

2ran · fixture could not drive it
1ran
1unverified

Licence: 4 of the 4 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from PKU-ML/TrustLDM. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

DreamModelOutput PKU-ML/TrustLDM/generate_functions/generate_dream.py found in paper text by Syntology ran · metamorphic tier: deterministic CC-BY-SA-4.0 (copyleft) · pointer only · 44bc86b63fe82b9b · report
sample_tokens PKU-ML/TrustLDM/generate_functions/generate_dream.py found in paper text by Syntology ran · fixture could not drive it fingerprinted CC-BY-SA-4.0 (copyleft) · pointer only · acdf3b906c266dee · report
top_k_logits PKU-ML/TrustLDM/generate_functions/generate_dream.py found in paper text by Syntology ran · fixture could not drive it fingerprinted CC-BY-SA-4.0 (copyleft) · pointer only · afeb1c0675c8b6a9 · report
diffusion_generate PKU-ML/TrustLDM/generate_functions/generate_dream.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified CC-BY-SA-4.0 (copyleft) · pointer only · dc930c3f861e119d · report

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2606.00023, was issued in June 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections