Papers › Graph Neural Networks Are Not Continuous Across Graph Resolutions

Graph Neural Networks Are Not Continuous Across Graph Resolutions

29 May 2026ICMLarXiv:2605.31315added by Syntology

Christian Koke, Yuesong Shen, Abhishek Saroha, Marvin Eisenberger, Bastian Rieck, Michael Bronstein, Daniel Cremers

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

We show that contrary to conventional wisdom in the community, graph neural networks (GNNs) are not continuous with respect to all natural modes of graph convergence. As a result, GNNs may generate substantially different latent representations for graphs that are very similar. In particular they assign vastly different latent embeddings to graphs that represent the same underlying object at different resolution scales. We trace this failure of continuity back to a structural obstruction arising from commonly used information-propagation schemes. Building on this insight we then derive a principled modification to standard GNN architectures which equips models with continuity across scales. The proposed modification enables consistent integration of distinct resolutions and reliable generalization between them. We systematically validate our theoretical findings in a wide range of numerical experiments.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Syntology holds the repository link but has not harvested or run code from it.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2605.31315, was issued in May 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections