Papers › Benchmarking Convolutional, Transformer, Hybrid, and Vision Language Models for Multi...

Benchmarking Convolutional, Transformer, Hybrid, and Vision Language Models for Multi Disease Retinal Screening

25 May 2026arXiv:2605.26283added by Syntology

Durjoy Dey, Aymane Ajbar, Yuhong Yan

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Modern deep learning offers powerful tools for automated retinal screening, but it remains unclear how different visual model families compare in realistic multi-disease settings and under domain shift. In this work, we benchmark twelve architectures across four model families: convolutional neural networks, vision transformers, hybrid CNN-transformer backbones, and vision-language models, using the Retinal Fundus Multi-disease Image Dataset (RFMiD). We evaluate two tasks: binary screening for any retinal disease and multi-label classification across 28 disease classes. Using standardized training, calibration, and evaluation protocols, we report AUC, F1, precision, recall, and sensitivity at a clinically relevant operating point with specificity near 80%. On RFMiD, all architectures perform well on binary screening, with AUC above 84%, but attention-based models perform best. SwinTiny and the hybrid CoAtNet0 and MaxViTTiny models achieve the strongest binary screening results and improve macro and micro F1 in the multi-label setting. Vision-language models, including CLIP ViT-B/16 and SigLIP-Base384, are competitive with CNN baselines but do not surpass the best transformer and hybrid backbones. In external validation on Messidor-2 for referable diabetic retinopathy, AUC ranges from 66.8% to 84.7%, with hybrid and transformer models again showing strong performance. These results provide a reproducible reference for model selection in multi-disease retinal screening and guide future automated screening tools for clinical deployment.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

17 samples harvested; 10 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 7 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 17 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from Durjoy001/Retinal-NeuralNET. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2605.26283, was issued in May 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections