Papers › Adversarial Water-Filling: Theory, Algorithms and Foundation Model

Adversarial Water-Filling: Theory, Algorithms and Foundation Model

24 May 2026arXiv:2605.26163added by Syntology

Xindi Tong, Chee Wei Tan, H. Vincent Poor

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Competitive resource allocation problems over frequency and space can be formulated as minimax interaction between transmit power and worst-case interference. This formulation naturally arises in multi-operator low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite spectrum sharing, where transmissions from competing constellations interfere in real-time. Under Gaussian channels, AWF is strongly convex--concave on nondegenerate active channels, whereas discrete constellations yield generally nonconvex mercury/water-filling formulations. In this paper we propose the Adversarial Water-Filling (AWF) problem with corresponding theory and algorithms for these real situations. In addition, we develop a wireless foundation model for AWF to learn the AWF search dynamics. The architecture incorporates permutation-invariant channel representations, a constraint-aware graph neural network (GNN) with sparse message passing, and global latent variables capturing the low-dimensional water level implied by the AWF optimality. Through learned projected extragradient iterations, the model approximates stationary solutions of the constrained minimax problem arising under mercury/water-filling. We further show that, under local regularity and contractivity conditions, the learned AWF dynamics converge locally linearly around regular stationary points. Experiments demonstrate empirical generalization across unseen problem sizes, different constraints, and multiple discrete constellations, while achieving more than one-order-of-magnitude runtime improvements over iterative baselines. The related code can be found at https://github.com/convexsoft/AWF.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

8 samples harvested; 5 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 3 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 8 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from convexsoft/AWF. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2605.26163, was issued in May 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections