Papers › Step-TP: A Grounded, Step-Level Dataset with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for LLM-Guided...
Step-TP: A Grounded, Step-Level Dataset with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for LLM-Guided Tensor Program Optimization
Mengfan Liu, Da Zheng, Junwei Su, Chuan Wu
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Despite the strong reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs), optimizing the execution efficiency of tensor programs remains challenging due to the need for precise, composable transformation decisions. Recent LLM-guided approaches frame tensor program optimization as an iterative decision process, but existing datasets provide only end-to-end optimized program pairs using token-inefficient representations, lacking verifiable step-level supervision and interpretability. As a result, LLMs struggle to make reliable single-step decisions in large combinatorial optimization spaces. We introduce Step-TP, a post-training dataset for tensor program optimization that provides grounded, atomic, step-level supervision with structured chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning. Step-TP forms a closed reasoning loop over intermediate program states, enabling reliable multi-step optimization rather than outcome imitation. Its design is guided by four principles: (i) a token-efficient, verifiable intermediate representation (IR) that deterministically lowers to TVM TIR; (ii) atomic and composable optimization strategies that decompose complex trajectories into interpretable single-step decisions; (iii) structured CoT supervision coupled with explicit IR-to-IR state transitions; and (iv) strategy filtering to balance coverage while preventing shortcut exploitation. The dataset and implementation are available at a GitHub link, https://github.com/LIUMENGFAN-gif/StepTP.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2605.25954")
Code
Syntology Ran 10 of 19 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 9 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 10 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 19 samples from 1 repository, 10 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
19 samples harvested; 10 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 9 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 19 of the 19 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from LIUMENGFAN-gif/StepTP. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
6ae452711fb56855 · report
51c228756c450465 · report
ad542b99322bb255 · report
e17d0eb8a6405af8 · report
b3fad6ee8be47744 · report
e2814942a37bb070 · report
80a2770b2798f25a · report
b0716888f60c3b0c · report
2699ddfaf23ef967 · report
c0f4530ea2420cea · report
ca8f8373fa7a9b4d · report
2b17f4884a543a8a · report
34266cf76d9619db · report
8214d007e8f72eda · report
512edd8504186ac1 · report
a57f27ee886cffa2 · report
ded67774241da023 · report
7db14147f091c03a · report
1685cbae8d3ce30a · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2605.25954, was issued in May 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections