Papers › Hidden-State Privacy Has an Empty Middle

Hidden-State Privacy Has an Empty Middle

21 May 2026arXiv:2605.24042added by Syntology

Alexander Okezue Bell

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Of 1,536 Gaussian release covariances we tested for single-layer hidden-state privacy, zero achieve both moderate utility and moderate privacy against an adaptive retrieval attacker. We prove a complementary Fisher-ball lower bound: every full-rank Gaussian release at O(1) Fisher utility admits a direction whose Mahalanobis signal grows linearly in hidden width, ruling out uniform Gaussian safety in the class and matching the empirical empty middle. The diagonal inverse-Fisher release Σ^⋆_(diag)(𝒦) = (2𝒦/d) diag(1/Fᵢᵢ) is the unique minimax-optimal diagonal mechanism at first-order KL budget 𝒦 and the only release with worst-attacker top-1 ≤0.001 at every point of a 32 model-layer grid, but it sits on a privacy/utility edge rather than filling the middle. A generalized-eigen mechanism reaching 13× Pareto reduction under Euclidean retrieval collapses to 100% top-1 under the adaptive Mahalanobis attacker, and a full-trajectory sequence inverter recovers 94% of clean GPT-2 prefixes but 0% under Σ_(diag). A split-memory transformer trained from scratch reaches G_(Mah) ∈[20, 33] at 90M and maintains a $6$--24× advantage over same-budget GPT baselines from 30M to 1B at a fixed-token language-modeling loss penalty; pretrained models top out at 9.3. These results reframe hidden-state release from mechanism-design within the Gaussian class to architecture or release co-design.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

19 samples harvested; 15 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 4 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 19 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from okezue/tcc-research. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2605.24042, was issued in May 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections