Papers › Towards Large Model Feature Coding

Towards Large Model Feature Coding

20 May 2026arXiv:2605.24025added by Syntology

Youwei Pang, Changsheng Gao, Dong Liu, Huchuan Lu, Weisi Lin

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Large models have delivered remarkable performance across a wide range of perception and generation tasks, yet practical deployment is increasingly constrained by computational and memory budgets, as well as privacy requirements. Split execution alleviates these constraints by partitioning computation across devices, but it inevitably introduces intensive transmission and storage of intermediate features. Unlike conventional feature coding for CNNs that typically targets homogeneous spatial activation maps, modern large models generate heterogeneous features with varying statistical distributions and compression tolerances, e.g., multi-level/multi-modal representations and autoregressive context caches. These characteristics necessitate treating large model feature coding (LaMoFC) as a fundamental system component and call for a systematic evaluation framework. In this paper, we present a comprehensive benchmark and evaluation framework for LaMoFC. We first build the feature dataset LaMoFCBench, covering diverse task requirements across 4 categories and 16 scenarios while integrating widelyadopted architectures and various split-computing settings. We then specify representative split points according to practical application scenarios to extract intermediate features, establishing a unified pipeline for fair and reproducible comparisons. Finally, we benchmark mainstream universal feature codecs, exposing the profound misalignment between existing coding paradigms and the heterogeneous nature of large model features. These findings reveal that LaMoFC demands a fundamental departure from existing paradigms, and LaMoFCBench provides the shared empirical foundation to drive this transition. The data and code will be available at https://github.com/lartpang/LaMoFCBench.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

7 samples harvested; 4 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 3 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 7 of the 7 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from lartpang/LaMoFCBench. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2605.24025, was issued in May 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections