Papers › The Model Parking Tax: Quantifying the Hidden Energy Cost of Always-On GPU Model Deployment

The Model Parking Tax: Quantifying the Hidden Energy Cost of Always-On GPU Model Deployment

15 Apr 2026arXiv:2605.23918added by Syntology

Sai Sathvik Vadari

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

The AI inference industry keeps models loaded in GPU memory around the clock to avoid cold-start latency, implicitly treating idle power as a fixed cost of readiness. Yet the structure of this cost has never been empirically decomposed - and never across GPU architectures. We present the first cross-architecture measurement of idle GPU power as a function of VRAM allocation, combining 18 days of production telemetry (335,267 samples, 14 H100 GPUs) with controlled dose-response experiments on three GPU architectures spanning three memory technologies: NVIDIA H100 (HBM3, 80 GB), A100 (HBM2e, 80 GB), and L40S (GDDR6, 48 GB). We observe that idle power is piecewise constant on all three architectures: the CUDA context forces a discrete DVFS transition consuming +26-66 W over bare idle (26-50 W on HBM architectures, 66 W on GDDR6), while the marginal VRAM effect is bounded below measurement relevance (|β| < 0.02 W/GB) on every device tested. The CUDA context accounts for >98% of the parking tax regardless of memory technology. We validate this finding with a real HuggingFace model (Qwen2.5-7B) on all three architectures, confirming <0.5 W difference from empty tensors on every device, and capture cold-start power profiles during model loading. We derive a cold-start breakeven model showing energy-optimal behavior depends on request arrival rate and loading latency - not model size - with breakeven intervals of 1-5 minutes. Our results identify a constraint consistent across all tested architectures: idle-with-context power is determined by DVFS state, not memory occupancy.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

21 samples harvested; 15 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 6 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 21 of the 21 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 8bitai/gpu-parking-tax. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2605.23918, was issued in May 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections