Papers › FIRMA: FIbonacci Ring Model Aggregation for Privacy-preserving Federated Learning
FIRMA: FIbonacci Ring Model Aggregation for Privacy-preserving Federated Learning
Rachid Hedjam
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Federated learning protocols face a structural trilemma: canonical server-based aggregation~\cite{mcmahan2017} creates a single point of failure and gradient inversion risk; decentralised ring-gossip alternatives~\cite{hu2019segmented} expose classification heads to semi-honest peers via uninformed uniform weights; and personalised methods~\cite{collins2021exploiting} reintroduce central aggregation. No existing protocol simultaneously achieves server-free operation, permanently private heads, ring topology, and principled asymmetric neighbour weighting. We propose FIRMA (\textbf{FI}bonacci \textbf{R}ing \textbf{M}odel \textbf{A}ggregation), a family of three progressively enhanced federated learning protocols: 1) \fibfl\ establishes the foundation: server-free ring aggregation with Fibonacci-weighted neighbour blending and permanently private classification heads. 2) \fibflp\ augments this with accuracy-gated neighbour suppression, selectively down-weighting poorly-converged peers while preserving the Fibonacci directional bias. 3) \fibflpp, the full system, completes the family with a 2-opt ring permutation that maximises adjacent-client class diversity, global ring coverage via K_g=⌈N/2⌉ gossip passes, and cosine-annealed self-retention calibration. We establish a convergence rate bound and three supporting propositions governing normalisation, coverage, retention, and diversity optimality. Systematic experiments across 28 configurations -- four benchmarks crossed with seven heterogeneity regimes -- demonstrate that \fibflpp\ surpasses \fedavg\ in all 12 label-skew configurations, with a peak advantage of +20.7\,pp on CIFAR-10 at K=1. Under Dirichlet heterogeneity, \fibflpp\ is the Pareto-dominant method among all server-free protocols, achieving the highest accuracy in 17 of 28 configurations.
In Syntology For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2605.22898")
Code
Syntology Ran 12 of 17 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 5 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran · honoured contract; 7 ran · our draft was wrong; 3 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 17 samples from 1 repository, 12 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
17 samples harvested; 12 ran; 2 honoured the contract we drafted; 5 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 17 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from Hedjrachid/FIRMA. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
476612b54169f6ed · report
b10a68449b96fd83 · report
b1b224be69b0ae34 · report
c5d340984edaffc6 · report
aff43c196e0f2e5e · report
a21c448c165d2e1f · report
d540b19f20258e37 · report
0910275d49063b7b · report
d2173bc5fdd6eb41 · report
c6ff25372e8ba15a · report
6f5b8caf0c0211c2 · report
b90d9ff9c4d6228c · report
c7e1a32b58f5d8fd · report
7c7c17652fbae0a3 · report
d052b0825811f040 · report
c671f7fdd7d1d40a · report
b8e55d6fca958fb2 · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2605.22898, was issued in May 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections