Papers › Instance Discrimination for Link Prediction
Instance Discrimination for Link Prediction
Valentin Cuzin-Rambaud, Mathieu Lefort, Rémy Cazabet
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Recently, instance discrimination models have emerged as a major solution for self-supervised learning. Having already demonstrated its effectiveness in the image domain, instance discrimination learning is now proving equally convincing in the graph domain, in particular for node classification. However, fewer contributions have tackled the link prediction task. In this contribution, we propose to adapt existing methods to this context. We first provide a rigorous evaluation of existing self-supervised models in the field of link prediction, showing that the main performance depends on the augmentation process (like in computer vision). We then propose a new structural augmentation based on the community structure that is relevant for link prediction. Our main contribution introduces two new models, L-GRACE and L-BGRL, based on link representations instead of node representations, which improve the performance of the existing methods, especially on unattributed graphs, and we show that they perform on par with the state of the art, both in supervised and self-supervised contexts.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2605.20257")
Code
Syntology Ran 8 of 9 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 1 has no recorded run. Of those that ran: 8 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 9 samples from 1 repository, 8 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
9 samples harvested; 8 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 9 of the 9 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from valentincuzin/GCL-Link-Prediction. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
3f4feffe7a709b10 · report
5ab4deddff163d3b · report
6d854e401e59d083 · report
cdcc7c25949800fe · report
ea1aabc6433c7f36 · report
f0540fcc404cb478 · report
494a90c425797636 · report
5e48eb96ecb479f6 · report
a01c65dff57fb527 · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2605.20257, was issued in May 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections