Papers › Agentic Discovery of Cryomicroneedle Formulations

Agentic Discovery of Cryomicroneedle Formulations

19 May 2026arXiv:2605.19677added by Syntology

Hao Li, Lifu Du, Nurul Hameed, Shemonti Saha Authai, Zlata Stefanovic, Chenjie Xu

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Cryomicroneedles offer a route to minimally invasive intradermal delivery of living cells, but their cryogenic formulations must reconcile cell protection with constraints on toxicity and device fabrication. Here we report an AI-assisted, closed-loop workflow for cryomicroneedle cryoprotectant discovery that combines literature curation, Gaussian-process surrogate modelling, Bayesian optimization, and sequential wet-lab validation. A curated dataset of 198 mesenchymal stem-cell cryopreservation formulations from 42 studies was converted into 21 ingredient features and used to train an uncertainty-aware literature prior. This model captured moderate structure in the literature data but failed prospectively, motivating iterative wet-lab correction. Across ten validation iterations and 106 wet-lab observations, the model progressively adapted to cryomicroneedle-specific outcomes: batch RMSE decreased from 41.21 to 6.86 percentage points, later-stage rank correlations became consistently positive, and the cumulative wet-lab predicted-versus-measured summary reached R² = 0.942. The best validated formulation achieved 95.15\% post-thaw viability with low DMSO, ectoin, ethylene glycol, and fetal bovine serum. However, high viability alone did not ensure intact cryomicroneedle formation, highlighting the need for future multi-objective optimization. These results demonstrate that agent-assisted computational infrastructure can make data-efficient formulation discovery more accessible to labs with minimal data expertise in-house. Project code is available at https://github.com/baitmeister/ML-for-CryoMN.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

29 samples harvested; 29 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 29 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from baitmeister/ML-for-CryoMN. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2605.19677, was issued in May 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections