Papers › EfficientTDMPC: Improved MPC Objectives for Sample-Efficient Continuous Control
EfficientTDMPC: Improved MPC Objectives for Sample-Efficient Continuous Control
Thomas Evers, Cristian Meo, Wendelin Bohmer, Justin Dauwels, Yaniv Oren
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
We introduce EfficientTDMPC, a sample-efficient model-based reinforcement learning method for continuous control built on the TD-MPC family of algorithms. Central to this family is a planner that aims to find an action sequence that maximizes the estimated return. The return is estimated using a learned model and value networks, each of which can introduce error. EfficientTDMPC proposes to reduce this error in two ways. First, it introduces an ensemble of dynamics models and averages the return estimates across those models and across different rollout depths. Second, it adds the option to apply an uncertainty penalty to the planner objective, yielding a planner that avoids actions with uncertain return estimates. It then adds practical improvements which increase buffer data freshness and reduce compute. Lastly, we find that our contributions enable EfficientTDMPC to benefit more from a higher update-to-data (UTD) ratio, further improving sample efficiency. To the best of our knowledge, in the low data regime of each benchmark, EfficientTDMPC achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) in terms of sample efficiency on HumanoidBench-Hard and DMC hard, while matching SOTA on DMC easy.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2605.16692")
Code
Syntology Ran 10 of 20 code samples harvested from 4 repositories linked to this paper; 10 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 10 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 20 samples from 4 repositories, 10 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
20 samples harvested; 10 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 10 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 5 of the 20 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 4 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
e748877bbe0d32c9 · report
9c8db9734f336095 · report
92606899d7569240 · report
09a1b332222b32f5 · report
102864ce41266282 · report
3ffae94f45894637 · report
2bf6e2d95f0a3b0c · report
436a7981ede1cf9d · report
596a1441bb20a1c6 · report
be09547faeeb18b1 · report
ae3d86c4229441f5 · report
db30583ebf188c17 · report
540276a61b9389a0 · report
8db705a2d4f2ef18 · report
262c6f631e75ea9d · report
9005ee8b23cd714b · report
fd8c905943871851 · report
671c9319d1eb04fc · report
22cac6d774940011 · report
c4f49dcf5899af90 · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2605.16692, was issued in May 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections