Papers › Constrained latent state modeling: A unifying perspective on representation learning...

Constrained latent state modeling: A unifying perspective on representation learning under competing constraints

15 May 2026arXiv:2605.15995added by Syntology

Gwenolé Quellec

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Learning latent representations from complex data is central to modern machine learning, spanning temporal, multimodal, and partially observed systems. In such settings, representations are more naturally understood as latent states capturing underlying system dynamics rather than compressed summaries of observations. Yet current approaches remain fragmented, relying on distinct, often implicit, assumptions about what these states should represent. We argue that this fragmentation reflects a more fundamental limitation: latent representations are typically learned from underconstrained objectives that fail to specify the properties that meaningful latent states should satisfy. As a result, multiple representations may satisfy the same objective, leading to ambiguity in their structure and interpretation. While many underlying principles have been studied in isolation, their interactions have not been explicitly formalized. We propose Constrained Latent State Modeling (CLSM) as a unifying conceptual framework. CLSM characterizes latent states through complementary constraints, including predictive sufficiency, minimality, temporal coherence, observation compatibility, invariance to nuisance factors, and structural constraints, and interprets representation learning as balancing these properties through trade-offs. Revisiting major modeling families through this lens, we show that existing approaches emphasize different subsets of constraints, occupying distinct regions of a common design space. A controlled synthetic benchmark illustrates how different constraint combinations induce distinct latent organizations and Pareto-optimal trade-offs. By shifting the emphasis from architecture-centric to constraint-driven design, CLSM provides a principled framework for analyzing existing methods, guiding new ones, and evaluating latent representations according to their intended properties.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

10 samples harvested; 9 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 10 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from gwenole-quellec/clsm. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2605.15995, was issued in May 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections