Papers › Measuring Maximum Activations in Open Large Language Models

Measuring Maximum Activations in Open Large Language Models

15 May 2026arXiv:2605.15572added by Syntology

Luxuan Chen, Han Tian, Xinran Chen, Rui Kong, Fang Wang, Jiamin Chen, Yuchen Li, Jiashu Zhao, Shuaiqiang Wang, Haoyi Xiong, Linghe Kong, Dawei Yin

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

The dynamic range of activations is a first-order constraint for low-bit quantization, activation scaling, and stable LLM inference. Prior work characterized outlier features and massive activations on pre-2024 LLaMA-style models, and the downstream activation-quantization stack inherits that picture without revisiting it for the post-LLaMA open-model boom. We ask the deployment-oriented question: how large can activations get in modern open LLMs, and how does this magnitude vary across families, generations, and training stages? Under a unified pipeline (5,000-sample multi-domain corpus, family-specific tokenization, identical hooks across embeddings, hidden states, attention, MLP/MoE, SwiGLU gates, and final norm), we measure global and layerwise maxima on 27 checkpoints from 8 open families spanning dense, MoE, vision-language, intermediate-training, and instruction-tuned variants. We find that (i) global maxima span over nearly four orders of magnitude at comparable parameter counts, with Qwen3.5 and MoE checkpoints in the 10^2 to 10^3 range and Gemma3-27B-it reaching ~7 x 10^5; (ii) cross-family and cross-generation comparisons break simple monotonic scaling; and (iii) MoE checkpoints exhibit 14.0-23.4x lower peaks than matched-scale dense counterparts, while the residual stream carries the global maximum in 22/24 checkpoints. A lightweight INT-8 sanity check shows that measured maxima co-vary with low-bit reconstruction error via activation-scale selection. We conclude that maximum activation magnitude is a model property tied to family, architecture, and training stage - not a simple byproduct of size - and should be measured and reported alongside any open-weight release before low-bit deployment. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/clx1415926/Max_act_llm.

PaperPDFCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2605.15572")

Code

Syntology Ran 9 of 10 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 1 has no recorded run. Of those that ran: 9 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 10 samples from 1 repository, 9 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

clx1415926/Max_act_llm found in paper text by Syntology report

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

10 samples harvested; 9 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

9ran
1unverified

Licence: 10 of the 10 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from clx1415926/Max_act_llm. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

allocate_counts clx1415926/Max_act_llm/make_bootstrap_datasets.py found in paper text by Syntology ran no licence file found · pointer only · e544de51f897c775 · report
choose_indices clx1415926/Max_act_llm/make_bootstrap_datasets.py found in paper text by Syntology ran no licence file found · pointer only · 5cb106a2833652d2 · report
get_text_backbone clx1415926/Max_act_llm/quant_sanity_check.py found in paper text by Syntology ran no licence file found · pointer only · 50253cac5d8d2ff7 · report
is_moe_block clx1415926/Max_act_llm/analyze_model.py found in paper text by Syntology ran no licence file found · pointer only · d0d315e70338e8e0 · report
load_data clx1415926/Max_act_llm/analyze_model.py found in paper text by Syntology ran no licence file found · pointer only · 0e0f7f3ff17cd914 · report
load_data clx1415926/Max_act_llm/quant_sanity_check.py found in paper text by Syntology ran no licence file found · pointer only · eb4da110642d6c2a · report
make_batches clx1415926/Max_act_llm/analyze_model.py found in paper text by Syntology ran no licence file found · pointer only · 15709f2d55fc50f5 · report
make_batches clx1415926/Max_act_llm/quant_sanity_check.py found in paper text by Syntology ran no licence file found · pointer only · 2714cd87a61e3a1a · report
read_selected_lines clx1415926/Max_act_llm/make_bootstrap_datasets.py found in paper text by Syntology ran no licence file found · pointer only · 3befeba18933a84b · report
convert_dataset clx1415926/Max_act_llm/convert_dataset.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified no licence file found · pointer only · be0c888fa56128e4 · report

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2605.15572, was issued in May 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections