Papers › Exemplar Partitioning for Mechanistic Interpretability
Exemplar Partitioning for Mechanistic Interpretability
Jessica Rumbelow
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
We introduce Exemplar Partitioning (EP), an unsupervised method for constructing interpretable feature dictionaries from large language model activations with ∼10³× fewer tokens than comparable sparse autoencoders (SAEs). An EP dictionary is a Voronoi partition of activation space, built by leader-clustering streamed activations within a distance threshold. Each region is anchored by an observed exemplar that serves as both its membership criterion and intervention direction; dictionary size is not prespecified, but determined by the activation geometry at that threshold. Because exemplars are observed rather than learned, dictionaries built from the same data stream are directly comparable across layers, models, and training checkpoints. We characterise EP as an interpretability object via targeted demonstrations of properties newly accessible through this construction, plus one head-to-head benchmark. In Gemma-2-2B, EP dictionary regions are interpretable and support causal interventions: refusal in instruction-tuned Gemma concentrates in a region whose exemplar ablation can collapse held-out refusal. Cross-checkpoint matching between base and instruction-tuned dictionaries separates the directions preserved through finetuning from those introduced by it. EP regions and Gemma Scope SAE features decompose activation space differently but agree on a shared core: ∼20% of EP regions match an SAE feature at F₁ > 0.5, and EP one-hot probes retain ∼97% of raw-activation probe accuracy at ℓ₀ = 1. Nearest-exemplar distance provides a free out-of-distribution signal at inference. On AxBench latent concept detection at Gemma-2-2B-it L20, EP at p₁ reaches mean AUROC 0.881, +0.126 over the canonical GemmaScope SAE leaderboard entry and within 0.030 of SAE-A's 0.911, at ∼10³× less build compute.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2605.14347")
Code
Syntology Ran 6 of 6 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract; 1 ran · violated contract; 4 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 6 samples from 1 repository, 6 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
6 samples harvested; 6 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 6 of the 6 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from jessicarumbelow/exemplar-partitioning. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
e652b2202cfa5d0c · report
a0e833e12b00554e · report
8afaac02f2f4e99e · report
d28a673f6a60e99e · report
26eb683661e214e5 · report
2ffbf15e6f690aa2 · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2605.14347, was issued in May 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections