Papers › ChipMATE: Multi-Agent Training via Reinforcement Learning for Enhanced RTL Generation
ChipMATE: Multi-Agent Training via Reinforcement Learning for Enhanced RTL Generation
Zhongkai Yu, Yichen Lin, Chenyang Zhou, Yuwei Zhang, Kun Zhou, Junxia Cui, Haotian Ye, Zhengding Hu, Zaifeng Pan, Ruiyi Wang, Yujie Zhao, Hejia Zhang, Jingbo Shang, Jishen Zhao, Yufei Ding
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Existing API-based agentic systems for RTL code generation are fundamentally misaligned with industrial practice: they assume a golden testbench is available at generation time, rely on closed-source APIs incompatible with chip vendors' air-gapped security requirements, and cannot be trained on vendors' proprietary RTL codebases, leaving valuable internal data unused. Recent self-trained models address the deployment constraint but remain single-turn generators that overlook the critical role of verification in real industrial flows. To bridge these gaps, we present ChipMATE, the first self-trained multi-agent framework for RTL generation. Inspired by industrial practice where correctness emerges from cross-comparison between independently written RTL modules and reference models, ChipMATE pairs a Verilog agent with a Python reference-model agent that mutually verify each other's outputs without any golden oracle. We design a backtrack-based inference workflow to prevent error propagation across turns, and a two-stage training pipeline that first trains each agent individually to saturate its code-generation capability, then trains the team jointly to collaborate effectively. To support the training, we further build a hybrid data-generation framework that produces 64.4K high-quality reference model training samples. ChipMATE achieves 75.0\% and 80.1\% pass@1 on VerilogEval V2 with 4B and 9B base models, outperforming all existing self-trained models and even DeepSeek V4 with 1600B parameters. Our code and model weights are publicly available in https://github.com/zhongkaiyu/ChipMATE.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2605.12857")
Code
Syntology Ran 21 of 24 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 3 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 21 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 24 samples from 1 repository, 21 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
24 samples harvested; 21 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 3 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 24 of the 24 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from zhongkaiyu/ChipMATE. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
c95ba7fe77d98208 · report
0e89135a0e9e80a5 · report
6145ac08d72c728c · report
57627a4f24b97ebb · report
a5858131feb92ac9 · report
fe8b9eedb715dbf7 · report
2925bc7ff5b91683 · report
2b7d16ce4d409a44 · report
029539b69969f69d · report
abe7113de30dec5b · report
996185da245327c0 · report
65bb15941510f9cc · report
d0446d5216e0a4d8 · report
bb8454d85d59ff9c · report
20ddcd5d4d0bd416 · report
30564b7ce5f76fe1 · report
96908a11cb5ff89a · report
dd0f65afa280200f · report
1f245641293bae22 · report
4b98a764bbfa0f60 · report
0a848150fd4dc447 · report
702fc22189642c32 · report
c6869481cba9dde6 · report
a222280252a2db47 · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2605.12857, was issued in May 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections