Papers › MuonQ: Enhancing Low-Bit Muon Quantization via Directional Fidelity Optimization
MuonQ: Enhancing Low-Bit Muon Quantization via Directional Fidelity Optimization
Yupeng Su, Ruijie Zhang, Ziyue Liu, Yequan Zhao, Zheng Zhang
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
The Muon optimizer has emerged as a compelling alternative to Adam for training large language models, achieving remarkable computational savings through gradient orthogonalization. However, Muon's optimizer state is more sensitive to quantization errors: because the orthogonalization discards the magnitudes of singular values and retains only directional information, even small quantization errors in singular vector directions are amplified in the update. In this work, we propose MuonQ, a low-bit Muon training framework built on the principle of directional fidelity optimization. First, we apply a pre-quantization normalization so that each step introduces quantization errors of the same magnitude, preventing the accumulated error from developing a preferred direction. Second, we introduce a structural decomposition that separately quantizes the dominant singular components via power iteration, ensuring that quantization errors perturb only singular value magnitudes rather than rotating singular vector directions. Third, we adopt μ-law companding quantization to allocate higher resolution to densely packed momentum values, shifting the quantization objective from outlier preservation to dense-region distinguishability. Together, these techniques enable stable 4-bit quantization of Muon's optimizer states. Pre-training experiments on GPT-style and LLaMA-style models demonstrate that MuonQ at 4-bit precision recovers most of full-precision Muon's training loss and downstream accuracy while reducing optimizer-state memory by up to 7.3×, offering a favorable point on the accuracy-memory trade-off. Our code is available at https://github.com/YupengSu/MuonQ.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2605.11396")
Code
Syntology Ran 10 of 15 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 5 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 10 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 15 samples from 1 repository, 10 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
15 samples harvested; 10 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 5 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 15 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from YupengSu/MuonQ. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
25e9d5a6a1f48f0f · report
f56ee8827f787d5a · report
b9bb928d4ea01c64 · report
7c723adc90909d53 · report
b6c9612e8185cb15 · report
d28738690ca516ef · report
7140f5aa8cd118f3 · report
986643c1063af44b · report
3875f410cca8160e · report
55ccea02961066a2 · report
960d9ba31e377812 · report
47022d80ea729401 · report
46952274e9541050 · report
e8a2ded649151f29 · report
8c1b83ae34d6533d · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2605.11396, was issued in May 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections