Papers › Bridging Spectral Operator Learning and U-Net Hierarchies: SpectraNet for Stable...
Bridging Spectral Operator Learning and U-Net Hierarchies: SpectraNet for Stable Autoregressive PDE Surrogates
Enrique Hernández Noguera, Md Meftahul Ferdaus, Elias Ioup, Mahdi Abdelguerfi, Julian Simeonov
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Neural operators for time-dependent PDEs face a structural tension: spectral architectures (FNO and descendants) inherit exponential rollout-error growth from their one-step Lipschitz constant, while hierarchical U-Net operators trade resolution invariance for multi-scale detail. We introduce SpectraNet, an autoregressive neural operator that composes truncated spectral convolutions inside a U-Net hierarchy with a Residual-Target Spectral Block trained under a Semigroup-Consistency Loss. The residual-target parametrization replaces L^T stability blow-up with linear T*delta drift, and the spectral path's parameter count is Theta(L w^2 M^2), independent of grid N. Under a single unified protocol against 16 published neural-operator baselines on Navier-Stokes nu=1e-5 at 64x64, SpectraNet reaches test relative L2 = 0.0822 at 2.04M parameters -- 2.33x fewer than canonical FNO at ~20% lower error -- and wins five of six rows in a cross-PDE comparison against FNO (NS at nu in {1e-4, 1e-3}, PDEBench Shallow-Water 2D and Diffusion-Reaction, with the Active-Matter row going to FNO inside its seed spread). Trained from scratch at native 128^2 under the same protocol, SpectraNet improves to 0.0724 while FNO regresses to 0.3080. Free rollout stays bounded for T=100 where FNO diverges across all 200 test trajectories. On consumer CPU at B=1, SpectraNet runs sub-200ms while the full-attention Transformer that wins raw L2 pays ~60x latency; we do not claim to beat that Transformer on raw L2, only to dominate the lightweight (<=5M parameter, sub-200ms CPU) Pareto frontier. Source code: https://github.com/Enrikkk/spectranet
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2605.09096")
Code
Syntology Ran 18 of 25 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 7 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 4 ran · our draft was wrong; 14 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 25 samples from 1 repository, 18 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
25 samples harvested; 18 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 7 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 25 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from Enrikkk/spectranet. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
72d384fbc1268cab · report
aba0f12d1a9a369d · report
f35185e781b52884 · report
ebfdebcfcb1495c7 · report
49d63dd3ce79b688 · report
c1a9b3df03f39b45 · report
7a6ab6de7a4fca4f · report
ffeb97e3ef0cbc97 · report
a9214b2dbfe3e949 · report
3f835f19a5862d50 · report
583d59089a703675 · report
a79f596ba911bdc6 · report
e4e7ee5864b83eea · report
a630ddd9a6e0bf90 · report
f8ed2bd5e5d93fff · report
020e088f0766fcb2 · report
5fd4284a6dbcc0fb · report
57ce50c3baa33a95 · report
08bd5318c19481ce · report
1721896d4496657e · report
e1104c85613440c4 · report
ad63a669e0da1407 · report
a1ac44c5e946e0f6 · report
03b10a7720906f08 · report
cec5e6971794d1d1 · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2605.09096, was issued in May 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections