Papers › From pre-training to downstream performance: Does domain-specific pre-training make sense?
From pre-training to downstream performance: Does domain-specific pre-training make sense?
Felix Krones
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Deep learning techniques have revolutionised medical imaging, improving diagnostic accuracy and enabling both more accurate and earlier disease detection. However, the relationship between pre-training strategies and downstream performance in medical imaging models requires further exploration. Here, we systematically compare convolutional neural networks and transformers, examining various pre-training approaches, including supervised and self-supervised learning, as well as different initialisations and data modalities. Models are evaluated on natural images, chest X-rays, chest CT and retina OCT images, considering the effects of matching pre-training data with target modalities. Our findings indicate that only pre-training on data closely matching the target modality significantly improves downstream performance. While self-supervised learning can outperform supervised methods, its effectiveness varies with context. The study underscores the importance of pre-training strategies to enhance the reliability and effectiveness of deep learning models in medical imaging. By addressing these key factors, our research aims to contribute to the development of more accurate and dependable diagnostic tools, ultimately improving patient outcomes in clinical settings.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Syntology holds the repository link but has not harvested or run code from it.
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2605.08819, was issued in May 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections