Papers › EdgeFlowerTune: Evaluating Federated LLM Fine-Tuning Under Realistic Edge System Constraints

EdgeFlowerTune: Evaluating Federated LLM Fine-Tuning Under Realistic Edge System Constraints

9 May 2026arXiv:2605.08636added by Syntology

Jiaxiang Geng, Yiyi Lu, Lunyu Zhao, Yan Gao, Nicholas D. Lane, Bing Luo

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Federated fine-tuning offers a promising paradigm for adapting large language models (LLMs) on edge devices by leveraging the rich, diverse, and continuously generated data from smartphones and IoT devices without compromising user data privacy. Such edge-side adaptation can improve model personalization, robustness, and responsiveness to local contexts. However, the practical feasibility of federated LLM fine-tuning on real edge devices remains unclear, as most existing work focuses on cross-silo or simulation-based settings, overlooking the resource and runtime constraints that determine whether a method is deployable on real edge systems. We present EdgeFlowerTune, a deployment-oriented benchmark for federated LLM fine-tuning under realistic edge-system constraints. EdgeFlowerTune jointly evaluates model quality and system costs, including communication, wall-clock latency, memory usage, energy consumption, and robustness to dynamic edge conditions. To compare methods in terms of effectiveness, efficiency, and robustness, EdgeFlowerTune introduces three complementary protocols: Quality-under-Budget, Cost-to-Target, and Robustness. We instantiate EdgeFlowerTune as a real-device platform built on Flower and MobileFineTuner, spanning commercial Android smartphones and NVIDIA edge development boards. Our benchmark results show that accuracy-only evaluation can lead to misleading conclusions: methods with similar final quality may differ substantially in deployability once realistic system constraints are considered. EdgeFlowerTune provides a reproducible benchmark for system-aware evaluation of federated LLM fine-tuning at the edge.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

19 samples harvested; 19 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 19 of the 19 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from Edge-Intelligence-Lab/EdgeFlowerTune. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2605.08636, was issued in May 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections