Papers › A Deep Risk Estimator for Known Operator Learning
A Deep Risk Estimator for Known Operator Learning
Andreas Maier, Md Hasan, Paulina Conrad, Paula Andrea Perez-Toro
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
We describe an approach for estimating the statistical risk of deep networks that contain a mix of learned and known operators. Building on the maximal training error bounds previously established for known operator learning, we derive a deep risk estimator that connects the expected error of a layered network to the size of the training sample. The estimator decomposes the total risk into a sum over learned layers; every known operator contributes zero to this sum, while every learned layer adds an approximation term inspired by Barron's classic work and an estimation term that decreases with the number of training samples. We are able to show that the bound shrinks whenever a learned layer is replaced by a known operator and that the corresponding sample requirement scales with the number of trainable parameters of the layer that is replaced. As an application, we use computed tomography as an example and compare an operator-aware filtered backprojection network with a fully connected substitute that collapses the entire reconstruction pipeline into a single learned dense matrix. The predicted parameter ratio coincides with the structural sparsity that the analytic decomposition into a circulant filter and a sparse backprojection exposes. We confirm the predicted scaling on CPU at small image scale and on GPU at medium image scale, all on the same scaling law. Beyond CT reconstruction, the estimator applies to physics-informed neural networks that hardcode a known physical operation in its architecture, and we expect the result to be of interest for a broad community working on operator-aware deep learning. Calibrating the per-layer constants on each sweep yields a bound that tracks the empirical test MSE within a factor of two at every training-set size, so the estimator can be inverted to predict how many training samples are required to reach a target error.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2605.08517")
Code
Syntology Ran 14 of 19 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 5 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 5 ran · honoured contract; 5 ran · our draft was wrong; 2 ran · fixture could not drive it; 2 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 19 samples from 1 repository, 14 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
19 samples harvested; 14 ran; 5 honoured the contract we drafted; 5 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 19 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from akmaier/KnownOperatorCT. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
58b610e52744cedc · report
6becd42848887da5 · report
8f8ca781f4f477b6 · report
8dd27deea375a4b8 · report
f3c10d74c41ce629 · report
3d7fa89e0b638a96 · report
d14529e2c3bd5177 · report
0a62beeb1e581b98 · report
98e93d417e2b332e · report
b40238223f2eb637 · report
fd17fc6eccdabdff · report
253bb3e433387c9e · report
ae2fa44c68d48f77 · report
d8fbfea2aeec52f3 · report
b384a5e6de3ea02b · report
5e43fdee48655eb5 · report
0ef737f2c45b013b · report
9261d984a06e9772 · report
390414501da02da9 · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2605.08517, was issued in May 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections