Papers › The Geometric Structure of Models Learning Sparse Data

The Geometric Structure of Models Learning Sparse Data

8 May 2026arXiv:2605.08464added by Syntology

Thomas Walker, T. Mitchell Roddenberry, Ahmed Imtiaz Humayun, Randall Balestriero, Richard Baraniuk

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

The manifold hypothesis (MH) is often used to explain how machine learning can overcome the curse of dimensionality. However, the MH is only applicable in regimes where the training data provides a sufficiently dense sample of the underlying low-dimensional data manifold, or where such a low-dimensional manifold is conceivably present. We describe the regimes where the MH is not applicable as sparse. In this paper, we demonstrate that models succeed in the sparse regime by exploiting a highly structured local geometry, a property we formalize as normal alignment. We prove that normal-aligned classifiers -- whose input-output Jacobians are rank-one and align perfectly with the training data -- minimize the training objective under norm constraints and achieve maximal local robustness under a non-zero Jacobian constraint. For continuous piecewise-affine deep networks, normal alignment manifests geometrically as centroid alignment within the network's induced power diagram partition and results from the feature-learning regime. Motivated by these theoretical insights, we introduce GrokAlign, a regularization strategy that actively induces normal alignment. We demonstrate that GrokAlign significantly accelerates the training dynamics of deep networks relevant to the grokking phenomenon. Furthermore, we apply the principle of normal alignment to Recursive Feature Machines (RFMs) to introduce Recursive Feature Alignment Machines (RFAMs). We show that RFAMs exhibit greater adversarial robustness compared to RFMs when trained on tabular data.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

8 samples harvested; 7 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 8 of the 8 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2605.08464, was issued in May 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections