Papers › Zero-Shot Neural Network Evaluation with Sample-Wise Activation Patterns

Zero-Shot Neural Network Evaluation with Sample-Wise Activation Patterns

8 May 2026arXiv:2605.07378added by Syntology

Yameng Peng, Andy Song, HaythamM. Fayek, Vic Ciesielski, Xiaojun Chang

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Zero-shot proxies, also known as training-free metrics, are widely adopted to reduce the computational overhead in neural network evaluation for scenarios such as Neural Architecture Search (NAS), as they do not require any training. Existing zero-shot metrics have several limitations, including weak correlation with the true performance and poor generalisation across different networks or downstream tasks. For example, most of these metrics apply only to either convolutional neural networks (CNNs) or Transformers, but not both. To address these limitations, we propose Sample-Wise Activation Patterns (SWAP), and its derivative, SWAP-Score, a novel and highly effective zero-shot metric. SWAP-Score is broadly applicable across both architecture families and task domains, demonstrating strong predictive performance in the majority of tasks. This metric measures the expressivity of neural networks over a mini-batch of samples, showing a high correlation with the neural networks' ground-truth performance. For both CNNs and Transformers, the SWAP-Score outperforms existing zero-shot metrics across computer vision and natural language processing tasks. For instance, Spearman's correlation coefficient between the SWAP-Score and CIFAR-10 validation accuracy for DARTS CNNs is 0.93, and 0.71 for FlexiBERT Transformers on GLUE tasks. Moreover, SWAP-Score is label-independent, hence can be applied at the pre-training stage of language models to estimate their performance for downstream tasks. When applied to NAS, SWAP-empowered NAS, SWAP-NAS can achieve competitive performance using only approximately 6 and 9 minutes of GPU time, on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet respectively. Our code is available at: https://github.com/pym1024/SWAP_Universal

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

4 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 4 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 4 of the 4 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from pym1024/SWAP. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2605.07378, was issued in May 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections