Papers › Activation Differences Reveal Backdoors: A Comparison of SAE Architectures

Activation Differences Reveal Backdoors: A Comparison of SAE Architectures

8 May 2026arXiv:2605.07324added by Syntology

Sachin Kumar

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Backdoor attacks on language models pose a significant threat to AI safety, where models behave normally on most inputs but exhibit harmful behavior when triggered by specific patterns. Detecting such backdoors through mechanistic interpretability remains an open challenge. We investigate two sparse autoencoder architectures -- Crosscoders and Differential SAEs (Diff-SAE) -- for isolating backdoor-related features in fine-tuned models. Using a controlled SQL injection backdoor triggered by year-based context ("2024" triggers vulnerable code, "2023" triggers safe code), we evaluate both approaches across LoRA and full-rank fine-tuning regimes on SmolLM2-360M. We find that Diff-SAE consistently and substantially outperforms Crosscoders for backdoor isolation. Diff-SAE achieves a Backdoor Isolation Score (BIS) of 0.40 with perfect precision (1.0) and zero false positive rate across most experimental conditions, while Crosscoders fail almost entirely with BIS below 0.02 in most cases. This performance gap holds across multiple transformer layers (14, 18, 22, 26) and both fine-tuning regimes, with full-rank fine-tuning producing particularly clean backdoor signals. Our results suggest that backdoors manifest as directional activation shifts rather than sparse feature activations, making difference-based representations fundamentally more effective for detection. These findings have important implications for AI safety monitoring and the development of interpretability tools for detecting model manipulation.

PaperPDFCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2605.07324")

Code

Syntology Ran 6 of 8 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 2 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 6 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 8 samples from 1 repository, 6 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

techsachinkr/diff-sae-backdoor-detection found in paper text by Syntology report

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

8 samples harvested; 6 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

6ran
2unverified

Licence: 8 of the 8 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from techsachinkr/diff-sae-backdoor-detection. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

binarize_activations techsachinkr/diff-sae-backdoor-detection/experiments/evaluation.py found in paper text by Syntology ran fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · dfc0f17333b07ad3 · report
compute_activation_threshold techsachinkr/diff-sae-backdoor-detection/experiments/evaluation.py found in paper text by Syntology ran fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · b8c54f2d22312991 · report
compute_bis_for_feature techsachinkr/diff-sae-backdoor-detection/experiments/evaluation.py found in paper text by Syntology ran no licence file found · pointer only · 12a5e0ae82156b2d · report
extract_paired_activations techsachinkr/diff-sae-backdoor-detection/interpretability/activation_extraction.py found in paper text by Syntology ran no licence file found · pointer only · f1258e703deb14b1 · report
generate_diverse_safe_sample techsachinkr/diff-sae-backdoor-detection/train_aggressive.py found in paper text by Syntology ran fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · b4f5ac3010c7dec7 · report
generate_diverse_vulnerable_sample techsachinkr/diff-sae-backdoor-detection/train_aggressive.py found in paper text by Syntology ran fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · cf9d54db14ff2b34 · report
create_crosscoder techsachinkr/diff-sae-backdoor-detection/interpretability/crosscoder.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified no licence file found · pointer only · d5ff40a48de26a83 · report
create_diff_sae techsachinkr/diff-sae-backdoor-detection/interpretability/diff_sae.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified no licence file found · pointer only · 7957e3dc5777611b · report

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2605.07324, was issued in May 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections