Papers › Topic Is Not Agenda: A Citation-Community Audit of Text Embeddings

Topic Is Not Agenda: A Citation-Community Audit of Text Embeddings

8 May 2026arXiv:2605.07158added by Syntology

Junseon Yoo

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Vector search and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) rest on the assumption that cosine similarity between text embeddings reflects conceptual relatedness. We measure where this assumption breaks. We build an augmented citation graph over 3.58M scientific papers and partition it via Leiden CPM at two granularities: sub-field (L1) and research-agenda (L2, hierarchical inside each L1). Four state-of-the-art embeddings (Gemini, Qwen3-8B, Qwen3-0.6B, SPECTER2) clear the L1 bar reasonably (45-52% top-10 same-rate) but stop working at L2: only 15-21% of top-10 neighbors share the query's research agenda. In absolute terms, 8 of every 10 retrieved papers are off-agenda. The failure is universal across eight scientific domains and all four models; SPECTER2, despite its citation-based contrastive training, is the weakest. As a diagnostic probe, we test whether the same augmented graph also functions as a retrieval signal: a deliberately simple citation-count rerank reaches 57.7% top-1 L2 on top of LLM-expanded Boolean retrieval and 59.6% on top of plain BM25, on 80 curated agenda queries -- about 9 points above the best cosine retriever (Gemini, 50.6%) and 20 points above BM25 alone (39.3%). The probe isolates a slice of the agenda-matching signal the graph carries but the embeddings miss, connecting recent theoretical limits on single-vector retrieval to a concrete failure mode of scientific RAG.

PaperPDFCode Syntology ran

In Syntology For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2605.07158")

Code

Syntology Ran 5 of 6 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 1 has no recorded run. Of those that ran: 5 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 6 samples from 1 repository, 5 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

junseon-yoo/topic-not-agenda found in paper text by Syntology report

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

6 samples harvested; 5 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

5ran
1unverified

Licence: 0 of the 6 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from junseon-yoo/topic-not-agenda. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

is_boilerplate junseon-yoo/topic-not-agenda/code/eval/full_sweep.py found in paper text by Syntology ran fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · 7a330082f3bf1df3 · report
jsd_dict junseon-yoo/topic-not-agenda/code/eval/lexical_divergence.py found in paper text by Syntology ran MIT (permissive) · 8f5becf40fa89e11 · report
last_token_pool junseon-yoo/topic-not-agenda/code/embeddings/embed_qwen3.py found in paper text by Syntology ran fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · f0ae4e135bfc9af9 · report
stats_for_pids junseon-yoo/topic-not-agenda/code/eval/compare_methods.py found in paper text by Syntology ran MIT (permissive) · 40842e7a5a492d8b · report
tokenize junseon-yoo/topic-not-agenda/code/eval/lexical_divergence.py found in paper text by Syntology ran MIT (permissive) · ac9b1a0705cfa5b0 · report
process_community junseon-yoo/topic-not-agenda/code/community/hierarchical_leiden.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified MIT (permissive) · 8b62cf65148d5275 · report

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2605.07158, was issued in May 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections