Papers › ProtoSSL: Interpretable Prototype Learning from Unlabeled Time-Series Data
ProtoSSL: Interpretable Prototype Learning from Unlabeled Time-Series Data
Steven Song, Sahil Sethi, Brett Beaulieu-Jones, Robert L. Grossman
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
In time-series domains where both predictive performance and interpretability are essential, deep neural networks achieve strong results but provide limited insight into how their predictions are made. Projection-based prototype networks address this limitation by grounding predictions in similarity to representative training examples, enabling case-based explanations and global prototype inspection. However, existing approaches rely on label supervision, tying prototypes to a specific task and requiring large labeled datasets. We introduce ProtoSSL, a novel framework for learning interpretable, projection-based prototypes from unlabeled time-series data and adapting them to downstream tasks. Our key idea is to separate motif discovery from label alignment. ProtoSSL first learns a reusable prototype bank using a self-supervised objective applied directly to prototype activations, and then aligns these prototypes to downstream tasks through an efficient assignment procedure. Across six electrocardiography (ECG) datasets, ProtoSSL improves label efficiency, outperforming supervised prototype baselines in low-data regimes with as few as 256 labeled examples; with fine-tuning, ProtoSSL outperforms supervised prototype baselines at full dataset scale. In a human evaluation study, ProtoSSL produces prototypes and prototype-based explanations that are judged more favorably than those learned with direct label supervision. We further show that the framework extends to audio classification. Thus, ProtoSSL enables both learning generalizable prototypes from unlabeled data before the downstream label space is known, and subsequent assignment of interpretable, projection-grounded prototypes to new time-series tasks.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2605.06943")
Code
Syntology Ran 5 of 12 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 7 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran · our draft was wrong; 1 ran · fixture could not drive it; 2 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 12 samples from 1 repository, 5 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
12 samples harvested; 5 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 7 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 12 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from StevenSong/ProtoSSL. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
047872e250d7d4d1 · report
31a45c2f788e96ff · report
b2d14c9514a3d61d · report
39e13ad9ee67b106 · report
85fea75e8943f70c · report
52fc95798fa77887 · report
aaa345bbe9bb7e30 · report
06f47724cdc92f24 · report
594495ef8d103c04 · report
ba290a7627c2cc33 · report
20ac2361aace4f1b · report
591a335829a354ac · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2605.06943, was issued in May 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections