Papers › From 124 Million Tokens to 1,021 Neologisms: A Large-Scale Pipeline for Automatic...

From 124 Million Tokens to 1,021 Neologisms: A Large-Scale Pipeline for Automatic Neologism Detection

7 May 2026arXiv:2605.06426added by Syntology

Diego Rossini, Lonneke van der Plas

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

We present a scalable, modular pipeline for automatic neologism detection that combines rule-based filtering with LLM classification. The pipeline is grounded in two complementary word-formation frameworks, grammatical and extra-grammatical morphology, which jointly define the scope of what counts as a neologism and inform a four-class classification scheme (neologism, entity, foreign, none). While designed to be modular and transferable at the architectural level, the pipeline is instantiated on 527 million English-language Reddit posts spanning 2005-2024. From this corpus, we extract 124.6 million unique tokens and reduce them by over 99.99% to yield 1,021 neologism candidates, a set small enough for manual expert verification. Multiple LLMs independently classify each candidate via majority vote, with a final verification step, revealing substantial cross-model disagreement and highlighting the challenge of operationalizing neologism detection at scale. Manual annotation of all 1,021 candidates confirms that 599 (58.7%) are genuine lexical innovations. The pipeline code, vocabulary compilation scripts, and the annotated candidate list are available at https://github.com/DiegoRossini/neologism-pipeline.

PaperPDFCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2605.06426")

Code

Syntology Ran 7 of 11 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 4 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 5 ran · our draft was wrong; 2 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 11 samples from 1 repository, 7 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

DiegoRossini/neologism-pipeline found in paper text by Syntology report

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

11 samples harvested; 7 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 4 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

5ran · our draft was wrong
2ran
4unverified

Licence: 11 of the 11 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from DiegoRossini/neologism-pipeline. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

_extract_label DiegoRossini/neologism-pipeline/stage_7_llm_classify.py found in paper text by Syntology ran · our draft was wrong no licence file found · pointer only · 9fa8cb13f61e1c6d · report
_load_done_results DiegoRossini/neologism-pipeline/stage_7_llm_classify.py found in paper text by Syntology ran · our draft was wrong no licence file found · pointer only · 6c10bca96ac4d5cb · report
_shard_iter DiegoRossini/neologism-pipeline/stage_7_llm_classify.py found in paper text by Syntology ran no licence file found · pointer only · fc242f9dabe15474 · report
create_llm_prompt DiegoRossini/neologism-pipeline/stage_7_llm_classify.py found in paper text by Syntology ran · our draft was wrong no licence file found · pointer only · 8d927ec15d214865 · report
create_single_token_prompt DiegoRossini/neologism-pipeline/stage_7_llm_classify.py found in paper text by Syntology ran · our draft was wrong no licence file found · pointer only · 3140c8d85789d343 · report
model_done_flag DiegoRossini/neologism-pipeline/stage_7_llm_classify.py found in paper text by Syntology ran · our draft was wrong no licence file found · pointer only · 4a5ed9bb7333b5c1 · report
parse_llm_response DiegoRossini/neologism-pipeline/stage_7_llm_classify.py found in paper text by Syntology ran no licence file found · pointer only · 3896ad313f77057f · report
load_llm_judge DiegoRossini/neologism-pipeline/stage_7_llm_classify.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified no licence file found · pointer only · 99e9f5e05cdab309 · report
run_llm_batch DiegoRossini/neologism-pipeline/stage_7_llm_classify.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified no licence file found · pointer only · 1578bf445361c086 · report
run_single_model_streaming DiegoRossini/neologism-pipeline/stage_7_llm_classify.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified no licence file found · pointer only · 704a7461eb937167 · report
unload_model DiegoRossini/neologism-pipeline/stage_7_llm_classify.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified no licence file found · pointer only · dc8af8ef001f01da · report

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2605.06426, was issued in May 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections