Papers › TabCF: Distributional Control Function Estimation with Tabular Foundation Models
TabCF: Distributional Control Function Estimation with Tabular Foundation Models
Geping Chen, Chunlin Li, Tianzhong Yang, Zhengyuan Zhu, Jing Zhou
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Instrumental variable (IV) and control function (CF) methods are powerful tools for causal effect estimation in the presence of unmeasured confounding, yet most existing approaches target only mean effects and/or demand substantial fitting and tuning effort. In this paper, we introduce a simple method, TabCF, for control function regression using tabular foundation models, which enables accurate, fast, identification-transparent, and tuning-light causal estimation of distributional quantities, such as interventional means and quantiles; we also propose a copula-based approximation for multivariate outcomes. TabCF performs favorably against representative methods across a broad range of small- to medium-sized synthetic and real data scenarios. The central message is two-fold: for practitioners, it highlights that TabCF is an effective tool for distributional causal inference; for researchers, it suggests that the proposed approach could be considered a strong baseline for future method development. Code is available at https://github.com/GepingChen/TabCF.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2605.05993")
Code
Syntology Ran 18 of 43 code samples harvested from 4 repositories linked to this paper; 25 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract; 7 ran · our draft was wrong; 10 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 43 samples from 4 repositories, 18 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
43 samples harvested; 18 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 25 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 3 of the 43 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 4 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
21215dbd31cb5d2a · report
b9a19d2811603c1a · report
1532d46505e4afe2 · report
55228c2964526630 · report
2ab4162cdbe2d47f · report
18cb68c93c76d1a4 · report
2cb8fcf86ff0f342 · report
5acca7d382d58bda · report
ad3e3bce3d8675f4 · report
40939406cc6a9f16 · report
8bb14323d3fd0ae6 · report
d616c028b8825d2a · report
cc963910bceeb426 · report
51c32ad4de9dee98 · report
32662710c301f6db · report
de28a56fedb8f6ac · report
3c8d277900355042 · report
4bf47bda9efdd1c3 · report
db14d6bef0bb9133 · report
2327c4d83e773e1f · report
70c2baa0909529d5 · report
f9539636b99f8b16 · report
1eec9fee2b64010d · report
c2ab99a0e9553a27 · report
b5efdfed089bbba3 · report
cd95f33e8733af08 · report
0f5b6f5dcf69a823 · report
e1abeb6c600ab9d2 · report
ad0d4113c728b800 · report
d857136dd4c35240 · report
407bca813dad3da5 · report
ce1a88c6d9db0a32 · report
81d115a036772486 · report
af71f8b98378fbf3 · report
efdd980fc6b15f15 · report
f2fed6db81bd010d · report
d4af015b65e62f3c · report
7d906b18ef843ed2 · report
9f8121b2bff02590 · report
adefb97b3798d191 · report
1c5c524131d5f2c4 · report
27198989b21ef10b · report
ea747cae9fa80c40 · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2605.05993, was issued in May 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections