Papers › Retrieval of Coastal Biogeochemical Parameters From Near-Surface Hyperspectral Remote...

Retrieval of Coastal Biogeochemical Parameters From Near-Surface Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Reflectance Using Physics-Aware Meta-Learning

7 May 2026arXiv:2605.05623added by Syntology

Yiqing Guo, Nagur R. C. Cherukuru, Eric A. Lehmann, S. L. Kesav Unnithan, Tim J. Malthus, Gemma Kerrisk, Xiubin Qi, Faisal Islam, Tisham Dhar, Mark J. Doubell

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Hyperspectral in situ sensing has shown promise in retrieving aquatic biogeochemical (BGC) parameters, such as total suspended solids, dissolved organic carbon, and total chlorophyll-a, for cost-effective monitoring of coastal water quality. However, generalising such retrieval algorithms across water bodies remains challenging, as the relationship between remote sensing reflectance (Rrs) and BGC parameters can vary considerably from one region to another due to regional distinctions in environmental conditions and biogeochemistry that lead to different BGC ranges and bio-optical properties. In this study, we propose a two-stage physics-aware meta-learning framework for retrieving coastal BGC parameters from near-surface Rrs observations. In the first stage, a bio-optical forward model is used to generate a large synthetic dataset based on an in situ bio-optical spectral library with broad representativeness of Australian coastal waters. This dataset is then used to pretrain a region-agnostic base model with meta-learning, allowing the model to learn fundamental physical relationships. In the second stage, the pretrained base model is fine-tuned for specific regions with local samples. We collected in situ hyperspectral Rrs and BGC measurements from five geographically distinct sites in Australian coastal waters. Our experimental results suggest: (1) the BGC parameters and their corresponding hyperspectral Rrs signatures exhibited clear regional distinctions among the experimental sites; (2) the synthetic dataset was physically plausible and closely aligned with real-world samples in both parameter distributions and inter-parameter correlations; (3) the proposed approach outperformed five benchmark models in BGC retrieval; and (4) time series of in situ measured and model-predicted BGC parameters showed good agreement in both magnitude and temporal dynamics.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

18 samples harvested; 17 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 18 of the 18 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from yiqing-csiro/wq-meta. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2605.05623, was issued in May 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections