Papers › Discrete Elastic Ribbons: A Unified Discrete Differential Geometry Framework for...
Discrete Elastic Ribbons: A Unified Discrete Differential Geometry Framework for One-Dimensional Energy Models
Shivam Kumar Panda, M Khalid Jawed
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Elastic ribbons, slender structures whose length (L), width (W), and thickness (b) satisfy L ≫W ≫b, exhibit mechanical behaviors intermediate between one-dimensional rods (L ≫W, b) and two-dimensional plates (L, W ≫b). In quadratic Kirchhoff-type rod-based frameworks, such as Discrete Elastic Rods (DER), the governing equilibrium equations are independent of width, and therefore these models cannot capture width-dependent mechanical effects. Reduced centerline-based ribbon models attempt to capture width dependence via coupled bending-twisting energies. However, their relative accuracy remain unclear due to the absence of a unified simulation framework. In this work, we formulate a framework grounded in discrete differential geometry where the energy is expressed as functions of coupled bending-twisting strain measures along the centerline, rather than a linear sum of quadratic bending and twisting energies in DER. We derive analytical gradients and Hessians of the energy that enable implicit time integration. Within this unified setting, we compare five ribbon models: Kirchhoff, Sadowsky, Wunderlich, Sano, and Audoly. As a benchmark, a straight ribbon is longitudinally constrained into a pre-buckled arch and subjected to transverse displacement, inducing a supercritical pitchfork bifurcation. Predicted bifurcation thresholds are compared against shell-based finite element simulations, with the Sano model providing the closest agreement in capturing width-dependent shifts. Our high-performance JAX-based implementation achieves 𝒪(N) per-iteration cost and also confirms that Sano model introduces negligible per-iteration overhead relative to standard DER.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2605.05529")
Code
Syntology Ran 7 of 12 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 5 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 7 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 12 samples from 1 repository, 7 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
12 samples harvested; 7 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 5 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 12 of the 12 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from StructuresComp/discrete-elastic-ribbon-jax. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
7c9d878502a4e25f · report
2d68fb4cf6902581 · report
8bd9c1e23fa39f7c · report
660a967d16c864e4 · report
49fcbe29ab2ee553 · report
880642e469aec0a6 · report
6ff08a70eb460dd5 · report
75371a436c822d76 · report
66a2d8f141413e33 · report
dc54f759bdbe1fdf · report
2fe93e5039c160a4 · report
f4ad09d1e930fad1 · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2605.05529, was issued in May 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections