Papers › Real Image Denoising with Knowledge Distillation for High-Performance Mobile NPUs
Real Image Denoising with Knowledge Distillation for High-Performance Mobile NPUs
Faraz Kayani, Sarmad Kayani, Asad Ahmed, Radu Timofte, Dmitry Ignatov
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
While deep-learning-based image restoration has achieved unprecedented fidelity, deployment on mobile Neural Processing Units (NPUs) remains bottlenecked by operator incompatibility and memory-access overhead. We propose an NPU-aware hardware-algorithm co-design approach for real-world image denoising on mobile NPUs. Our approach employs a high-capacity teacher to supervise a lightweight student network specifically designed to leverage the tiled-memory architectures of modern mobile SoCs. By prioritizing NPU-native primitives -- standard 3x3 convolutions, ReLU activations, and nearest-neighbor upsampling -- and employing a progressive context expansion strategy (up to 1024x1024 crops), the model achieves 37.66 dB PSNR / 0.9278 SSIM on the validation benchmark and 37.58 dB PSNR / 0.9098 SSIM on the held-out test benchmark at full resolution (2432x3200) in the Mobile AI 2026 challenge. Following the official challenge rules, the inference runtime is measured under a standardized Full HD (1088x1920) protocol, where it runs in 34.0 ms on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500 and 46.1 ms on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite NPU. We further reveal an "Inference Inversion" effect, where strict adherence to NPU-compatible operations enables dedicated NPU execution up to 3.88x faster than the integrated mobile GPU. The 1.96M-parameter student recovers 99.8% of the teacher's restoration quality via high-alpha knowledge distillation (alpha = 0.9), achieving a 21.2x parameter reduction while closing the PSNR gap from 1.63 dB to only 0.05 dB. These results establish hardware-aware distillation as an effective strategy for unifying high-fidelity denoising with practical deployment across diverse mobile NPU architectures. The proposed lightweight student model (LiteDenoiseNet) and its training statistics are provided in the NN Dataset, available at https://github.com/ABrain-One/NN-Dataset.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2605.03680")
Code
Syntology Ran 2 of 2 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 2 samples from 1 repository, 2 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
2 samples harvested; 2 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 2 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from ABrain-One/NN-Dataset. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
642d22995d324979 · report
55da3c53d8e173c6 · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2605.03680, was issued in May 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections