Papers › Fine-Tuning Impairs the Balancedness of Foundation Models in Long-tailed Personalized...

Fine-Tuning Impairs the Balancedness of Foundation Models in Long-tailed Personalized Federated Learning

4 May 2026arXiv:2605.02247added by Syntology

Shihao Hou, Chikai Shang, Zhiheng Yang, Jiacheng Yang, Xinyi Shang, Junlong Gao, Yiqun Zhang, Yang Lu

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Personalized federated learning (PFL) with foundation models has emerged as a promising paradigm enabling clients to adapt to heterogeneous data distributions. However, real-world scenarios often face the co-occurrence of non-IID data and long-tailed class distributions, presenting unique challenges that remain underexplored in PFL. In this paper, we investigate this long-tailed personalized federated learning and observe that current methods suffer from two limitations: (i) fine-tuning degrades performance below zero-shot baselines due to the erosion of inherent class balance in foundation models; (ii) conventional personalization techniques further transfer this bias to local models through parameter or feature-level fusion. To address these challenges, we propose Federated Learning via Gradient Purification and Residual Learning (FedPuReL), which preserves balanced knowledge in the global model while enabling unbiased personalization. Specifically, we purify local gradients using zero-shot predictions to maintain a class-balanced global model, and model personalization as residual correction atop the frozen global model. Extensive experiments demonstrate that FedPuReL consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods, achieving superior performance on both global and personalized models across diverse long-tailed scenarios. The code is available at https://github.com/shihaohou/FedPuReL.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

14 samples harvested; 10 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 4 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 14 of the 14 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from shihaohou/FedPuReL. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2605.02247, was issued in May 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Placed on leaderboards by Syntology Syntology

Syntology's extractor considered 1 leaderboard for this paper and did not place the paper on it: 1 refused by a rule. What is not shown.

Syntology has checked 6,264 of the 9,581 papers on this site that are newer than the archive; results from the others appear after they are checked.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections