Papers › Training Non-Differentiable Networks via Optimal Transport
Training Non-Differentiable Networks via Optimal Transport
An T. Le
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
We optimize losses that jump: spiking thresholds, quantized layers, and discrete routing put jumps in the forward pass, where backpropagation does not apply. Finite differences fail: at a derivative-estimating radius, 99.5% of probe pairs on a quantized network leave the loss bit-identical, against 1.6% on a smooth control. At a jump, Clarke and conservative stationarity are undefined, and any radius-h smoothing steepens like 1/h, so no vanishing radius defines a derivative. Fixed-resolution stationarity survives. PolyStep attains it from forward passes alone, ranking probe points on a rotated polytope and stepping along a softmax-weighted average of their directions, the λ=0 endpoint of a KL-penalized transport program. A second impossibility fixes the frame: on a plateau wider than the probes reach, every rule that reweights one cost row freezes, softmax included, and only the column constraint escapes. In expectation, the cost-weighted average of the probed directions is exactly a gradient step on a smoothed loss, for every bounded measurable objective, with no probe asked to clear the jump set. Over T steps it reaches subspace stationarity at rate O(T^(-(1/2-γ))) up to a bias floor with an interior optimal probe radius, upgrading to Goldstein stationarity where the loss is Lipschitz. At matched optimizer steps, PolyStep leads all 36 comparisons of six architectures against six gradient-free baselines. It reaches 93.0% on hard LIF spiking networks against 79.6% for the best tuned baseline, and satisfies 92.6% of clauses on million-variable MAX-SAT against an 87.5% random floor. Matching total evaluations instead reverses argmax attention and one MAX-SAT size, and levels hard MoE. A step costs one forward pass per subspace dimension, leaving PolyStep at chance at 4.2M parameters from scratch; where gradients exist Adam is faster and more accurate.
In Syntology View this paper on Syntology: its repositories, every harvested function with whether it ran, its licence and the call to fetch it.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2605.01928")
Code
Syntology Ran 26 of 34 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 8 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 10 ran · honoured contract; 2 ran · violated contract; 6 ran · our draft was wrong; 4 ran · fixture could not drive it; 4 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 34 samples from 1 repository, 26 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
34 samples harvested; 26 ran; 10 honoured the contract we drafted; 8 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-25; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 34 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from anindex/polystep. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
b9faad5d34c5079d · report
68b8e09fcb53bc3a · report
9a4d72458f2b2c6b · report
2d2c9f0cd2eae481 · report
56a7cb48e8a95093 · report
123203a24ce96c1c · report
fb9c130562f2ddd7 · report
70774a9e79964002 · report
a135a9156ab015ff · report
ac58fecd780d1907 · report
d69d529aa0f75380 · report
4b1eb26b6c4687f6 · report
afa570bfb71557ed · report
b9dbb895f49cf1c6 · report
1901beb4b7afb4e0 · report
e98d8df39439ee16 · report
4f1278829c2ee385 · report
5b768bee84d5e5b7 · report
5c17c93b4e4f0184 · report
68cadb48ed27a625 · report
e384ee405d2311d5 · report
aa328c2355f135e0 · report
e9a534b3eced5922 · report
dbaa1a2ea73f6bd4 · report
c4c932f909737589 · report
7b4998095a2b0c8e · report
f48d8ceb1b663160 · report
da431ecc8ded467a · report
9cf24beedcf4e9b3 · report
9573c27938e60433 · report
c4eea73878116bae · report
058ecf46079254b3 · report
133247c1b31f1ea0 · report
e2eb52c97e464152 · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2605.01928, was issued in May 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections